A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Question for US Rules committee on AH capability within LX NAV computers?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old April 7th 12, 09:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Paul Remde
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,691
Default Question for US Rules committee on AH capability within LX NAV computers?

"Sean F2" wrote in message
news:18597873.26.1333823663671.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@vbuc18...
I flew with XC soar 6.3 and the AH actually worked (looks like an actual AH,
globe blue top/brown bottom). It seems to function fairly well...but i
could not figure out how accurate it was. I think it was simply using GPS
alt and heading...not really a gyro funtion becuase it was easy to trick
with skids, slips and inverted flight. This was the first time I have seen
it function. As much of a toy as any other mobile based AH, but neat! Well
done Max and team.

As to the arguments that LXNAV is exempt from firmware requirements via USRC
(when Butterfly and others are not) to be legal to fly in US contests...I
simply disgree. The current LXNAV firmare has the AH mode code needed to
utilize harware which going to be burried in the panel or elsewhere.

The LXNAV firmware is ready to go, AH capable (this is a fact)...and nobody
is going to check to confirm if the AH box exists or is plugged in. Do the
only way to be sure is to require special firmware as butterfly has built.
Dangerous stuff indeed.

I think the RC needs to clarify this...

As for the personal comments I am amused. This should not be that
emotionally stimulating...

Sean
______________

Hi Sean,

I don't see anyone saying that LXNAV is exempt from anything. But it seems
to me that LXNAV has already met the requirements in the same way that
Butterfly has. The AHRS can be disabled for 14 days. And/or it can be
removed from the glider. I don't know what could be more rules compliant
than that.

Paul Remde




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
U.S.A Rules Committee: We Didn't Mean It? SoarPoint Soaring 3 November 15th 10 02:06 PM
US Rules Poll and Rules Committee Election Ken Sorenson Soaring 0 December 1st 06 01:36 AM
SSA Rules Poll and Rules Committee Election Ken Sorenson Soaring 2 October 6th 06 03:27 PM
US Rules Committee Election and Rules Poll Ken Sorenson Soaring 1 September 27th 05 10:52 PM
FLASH! U.S.A. Rules Committee to Address Rules Complexity? SoarPoint Soaring 1 February 3rd 04 02:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.