![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Z. Bush" wrote in message ... Rostyslaw J. Lewyckyj wrote: George Z. Bush wrote: If you knew your history, or were around at the time, you'd know without being told that the only reason the US was in that "police action" at all was that the Soviet Union, during those relatively early UN Security Council days, took a walk during one of their political snits when the subject came up for discussion. The SC, in their absence, approved UN intervention in behalf of South Korea; had the Soviet ambassador been present during that SC discussion, they could easily (and undoubtedly would have) vetoed it, since they had the right to do that as all original members of the Security Council could. Common knowledge. So, to answer your question, they fought in behalf of North Korea because North Korea was one of their client states to whom they furnished all kinds of military equipment and supplies, as well as the training in their use. They fought for the NKs because they did not want the world to think their MIG aircraft, in the hands of relatively green NK pilots, couldn't be competitive with US military equipment. If they could have turned back the clock, there wouldn't even have been a war, because they'd have prevented it from happening. That's it, in a nutshell. George Z. So you explain, interpret, this as an expression of simple commercial interests ? ;-) Only in part. I thought it obvious that everybody would assume that they would stand up for their ideological bedfellows, and so I didn't think that part of it was worth mentioning. (^-^)))) George Z. Stalin and the Soviets planned, trained, and equipped the North Koreans to prepare for the invasion as an instrument of Soviet foreign policy. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Russian Air Force Woes - Time to start again? | Peter Kemp | Military Aviation | 31 | February 21st 04 02:10 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
US kill loss ratio versus Russian pilots in Korean War? | Rats | Military Aviation | 21 | January 26th 04 08:56 AM |
RUSSIAN WAR PLANES IN ASIA | James | Military Aviation | 2 | October 1st 03 11:25 PM |