A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Question for US Rules committee on AH capability within LX NAV computers?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old April 16th 12, 11:21 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Don Johnstone[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 398
Default Question for US Rules committee on AH capability within LX NAV computers?

At 01:19 14 April 2012, Marc wrote:
On Apr 13, 5:50=A0pm, Don Johnstone wrote:
(The private key is in every flight recorder produced so all you
have to so is break into the software to get it, who wants to try and
compute it from the public key?)


The correct wording here would be that "A private key is in every
flight recorder produced so all you have to do is break into the
hardware to get it". Thank you for warning us, every badge or record
flight made by you or your mates in the future will require that the
flight recorder be sent to the IGC for inspection 8^)

Marc

That is not going to work. The same private code is used in many flight
recorders, so all you have to do is break into one and break into the
software. You then have the private key for all similar flight recorders.
Mine as you put it is still intact. It is pointless relying on a private
key of any length if you are going to put it out into the world in an
easily available box, that is not security, that is total ignorance and I
suspect the penny has already dropped with the IGC as well, took em long
enough.
Getting back to the subject of the AH here are so many solid state rate
gyros on the market, which will interface to a pocket PC or whatever that
is is a complete nonsence to ban soaring software that has ability to
display an AH. Using a small stand alone unit, smuggled into the glider in
your Glock holster would make far more sense if someone is determined to
fly in cloud. Having the instrument does not force you to fly in cloud
anyway. Banning useful software in this way is an ignorant and ineffective
thing to do, especially when the software is "Open Source" and you can
change it how you will with no-one else being the wiser.
I have managed to get two of my gyros I use on models to inteface with my
iPaq and provide a working artificial horizon so it is not at all
difficult. Anyone who would like plans forward your name on a £50 note
to............

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
U.S.A Rules Committee: We Didn't Mean It? SoarPoint Soaring 3 November 15th 10 02:06 PM
US Rules Poll and Rules Committee Election Ken Sorenson Soaring 0 December 1st 06 01:36 AM
SSA Rules Poll and Rules Committee Election Ken Sorenson Soaring 2 October 6th 06 03:27 PM
US Rules Committee Election and Rules Poll Ken Sorenson Soaring 1 September 27th 05 10:52 PM
FLASH! U.S.A. Rules Committee to Address Rules Complexity? SoarPoint Soaring 1 February 3rd 04 02:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.