![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 31, 8:52*pm, Tim Taylor wrote:
On May 31, 6:21*pm, Ramy wrote: On Thursday, May 31, 2012 4:47:46 PM UTC-7, wrote: On Thursday, May 31, 2012 5:17:17 PM UTC-4, John Cochrane wrote: You have to admit that the huge honking dipole antenna, coax cable, and mount, right in the middle of where you want to look on the glareshield amounts to Chinese torture. Or at least will not make for any cool industrial design awards. http://powerflarm.us/wp-content/uplo...dipole_SH..jpg I hope to heaven you guys can work out a prettier antenna and installation. Thanks to Dave and PowerFLARM US for the hard work at Perry and Mifflin to improve the PowerFLARM range issue. However I totally agree with John regarding the uglyness and size of the dipole antenna in the above URL. Forgive me for being reckless with my opinion but that installation sucks and is just not acceptable in the middle of one's vision field. My PowerFLARM order is "on hold" until a "no restricted vision" antenna is available. Please, please come up with something better. I second that. As much as I am advocating for powerflarm, I did not envision having to look through something like that, nor even through 2 rubber duckies that going all the way to the canopy. I sure hope there is less intrusive solution, even if it will reduce the range a little. BTW, I flew with my MRX PCAS antenna horizontally for years from the same reason and there was no noticable reduction in range, but I understand that powerflarm is much more sensitive to antenna installation. I sure hope a clean installation which does not interfere with visibility is available. After all, a powerflarm is no good if it reduces forward visibility. Ramy I was involved with installing about seven units and all were much more elegant than what you see on the web page. *Mine is installed about 4" in front on my compass that is on top of the glare screen. I only see the top 1.5 inches of the antenna which is very small and narrow. * Many others put the bulk below the glare screen with only the top 1.5 inches showing. It would be nice to see the antenna have the cable come in from one end rather than at the middle. Remember what you see so far were done in a loaned hanger on a rainy day in the midst of a contest. *Evan's is installed below and mine is very unobtrusive in flight. In a Schleicher installation, about 50% of the dipole will be below the glare shield. What's visible in my case may not be pretty, but I don't find it distracting or obstructing, any more so than my yaw string. I'll get some pics next opportunity. This really isn't a big deal, imo. If you think it might be a big deal, please keep an open mind until you see a good installation in a cockpit similar to what ever you fly. Evan Ludeman / T8 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PowerFLARM Brick and PowerFLARM Remote Display Manuals Available | Paul Remde | Soaring | 30 | May 25th 12 11:58 PM |
If your bored, think about this and notes about Ely, Nv. | [email protected] | Soaring | 15 | February 9th 07 11:30 PM |
Notes from the RAP pre-OSH party | Viperdoc | Piloting | 2 | July 23rd 06 06:24 PM |
DG500 AD notes | Sailplane Mechanic | Soaring | 2 | August 27th 04 05:35 PM |
A few notes from Uvalde | Dave Nadler YO | Soaring | 0 | August 13th 04 05:26 PM |