![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 18:17 09 June 2012, Vaughn wrote:
On 6/9/2012 1:52 PM, Kimmo Hytoenen wrote: FLARM can be a very good system. However, there are some issues which I am not sure if FLARM as a company is taking seriously enough. In US PowerFLARM seems to have some advantages over European version. This is a report of a very unfortunate midair, which should have been avoided. Both planes had FLARM systems installed. http://www.turvallisuustutkinta.fi/1302672994222 FLARM is an imperfect warning system just as parachutes are an imperfect rescue system. Clearly (and tragically) FLARM failed to prevent the above referenced accident. But also notice that one pilot was saved by his parachute, while the other unfortunately wasn't. Does the above accident imply that parachutes are a bad investment? Obviously the answer is no. Parachutes clearly save lives, even though they are imperfect. Does the above accident imply that FLARM is a bad investment? Same answer as above, same reasoning. Vaughn Very good point. What will chute manufacturer do if a chute fails to open? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sigh! More SHAW fun.... | Canuck[_5_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | May 30th 09 05:36 AM |