![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 11, 9:13*pm, Kimmo Hytoenen wrote:
At 13:44 10 June 2012, Bert TW wrote: On Jun 10, 1:16=A0am, Chris Nicholas *wrote: I think that if Flarm were installed with 2 antennae, one high in the cockpit or on top of the fuselage, and the other below, there would be no Flarm blind spot and it would be as near perfect as possible. We don=92t do that because it is too much trouble and/or too expensive. It is hard enough to persuade many pilots to have Flarm even in its most basic available form. Chris N. That's what I decided on last winter., because the Flarm range analysis on my carbon fuselage Flarm installation (Ventius cM) showed that there were some blind spot (ranges 2km). I installed an antenna splitter, the original Flarm antenna outside the fuselage near the gear doors, and a stripe antenna behind my head inside the canopy. "Blind spot" now means a range of 4 km ( a bit more than 2 nautical miles for the colonials). Investment was $200. My ass is worth more than that. Bert, This kind of information is exactly what I would like to hear. FLARM is an excellent idea, and I hope everyone installs one in their ship. Also I hope that everyone make sure that his/her FLARM system operates well. My problem is, that I have no idea how to improve FLARM operation. I have changed the position of antennas, and got mixed results, according to the range analysis. I believe that system of two antennas would be good. Can you Bert please share with us your knowledge of antenna splitters and antennas used, so that we can make similar installations. Possibly we could add necessary components intowww.soartronic.comas DIY kits, so that everyone can have one on minimum cost. Kimmo, I am not a specialist at all. By chance I discovered www.dolba.de where you can see the antenna mounted as strips into the canopy. I talked to the guy (Bernd Dolba, I'm pretty sure that he speaks English as well), and he talked me into installing two antennas. He obviously sold be the stuff he makes for that :-) but I'm happy with it. The splitter is a small passive box which receives the input of the two antenna, and feeds them into the antenna input of the Flarm. I did measure the required cable lengths first, and he send me the antenna, the splitter and the three cables (the lower antenna outside the fuselage is the original Flarm antenna, he just provided me the socket). Improvement was great - I had tried various positions/antennas in the previous year, but the combination of a carbon fuselage, a relatively solid instrument panel (it's GRP, but behind its crammed with metal boxes...) and my requirement that I don't want any antenna blocking any of my view is more or less hopeless for not having blind spots. With the present configuration, I cover the whole space around me. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sigh! More SHAW fun.... | Canuck[_5_] | Aviation Photos | 0 | May 30th 09 05:36 AM |