A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Mass Balancing explanation request.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5  
Old July 18th 12, 02:55 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,939
Default Mass Balancing explanation request.

On 7/16/2012 11:11 PM, BruceGreeff wrote:

Basically - look at an older design like an ASW20 in a high load
situation the wingtip has substantial vertical displacement. It appears
the wing is flexing to high Angle of attack on the outboard panels.
Possibly this is caused by a combination of the rotational drag force
from winglets as well as the aerodynamic load induced bending.

The straight leading edge means that the centre of pressure on the wing
remains ahead of the main spar all the way to the wingtip - at high load
this tends to rotate the weakest (torsionally) part of the wing to
higher AoA than desired.


I think you are making unwarranted assumptions:

* that Schleicher did not make the ASW 20 wing torsionally stiff enough
to avoid twisting; in fact, it had plenty of glass fiber in the skins
(the part of the wing that gives it torsional stiffness - the spar is
mostly for bending loads) to do just that.
* That the ASW 20 had winglets - it did not
* That the outer part of the wing is is the weakest torsionally; even if
it is, it is also the portion with the least torsional load on it

Modern two seaters often have the wing swept forward until about
midspan, which contradicts your claim.

The basic claim that the trapezoidal wings are a way to deal with
flutter might be right (I have not seen this claim before -
references?), but to claim wings without it are inadequate to meet their
design requirements is unsupported. There are several ways to increase
flutter speeds, even with straight leading edges, and designers used
them as needed.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA (change ".netto" to ".us" to
email me)
- "Transponders in Sailplanes - Feb/2010" also ADS-B, PCAS, Flarm
http://tinyurl.com/yb3xywl
- "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation Mar/2004" Much of what
you need to know tinyurl.com/yfs7tnz


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Explanation please; Figure 4-42, 43.14-1B mhorowit Home Built 4 August 29th 07 02:35 PM
I think I found an explanation of MX AustinMN Piloting 3 April 26th 07 05:48 PM
A & P in western Mass? orange Owning 1 September 27th 06 10:46 AM
An Explanation? Mike Kanze Naval Aviation 0 June 29th 06 09:27 PM
balancing act Stuart & Kathryn Fields Rotorcraft 10 June 1st 06 01:42 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.