![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Replacement_Tommel wrote:
||| In article . net, ||| Steven P. |||| McNicoll says... ||| ||| ||| "Replacement_Tommel" wrote ||| in message ... |||| |||| Why some think it's a "problem" if two people of the same sex |||| get married is beyond me, and I find it amusing when the far right |||| says we have to protect the santity of marriage when 50% of all |||| marriages between a man and a woman end up in divorce here in |||| the United States. |||| ||| ||| It's not that it's a "problem" if two people of the same sex get ||| married, it's just that it's impossible, and I find it amusing that ||| there are people that don't understand that. ||| || || IIRC there have been same-sex marriages in Holland for quite || sometime now... of course, some bigots in this country thought it || was "impossible" for whites to marry blacks because they considered || blacks to be animals instead of humans - is that your line of || thinking on why same sex marriages are "impossible?" I'm surprised this debate is still going on in this thread. Stephen, as I advised you earlier, let it go. Tom, if Stephen is going on the same as I, it would be based on religious belief as outlayed in the Bible and not really anything prejudicial in comparison/similarity to what you posted above, and no am not going to provide any more references than I already have since the one I gave has them in it. However, I'm just assuming that is where his argument is stemming from that it is "impossible". There is separation of Church and State but how far into reality is that? Legislators in my home state or pressing harder to ban these arrangements (I shall not refer to them as marriages, sorry). In any event, this is one of those debates that will go on and on. Both sides have made valid points, opinions, worthy of consideration; but ultimately, the decision rests with the voters and elected officials, doesn't it? ![]() I have a simple curiosity question, though. Should this issue really be discussed in military groups, where there are AD members posting, since the military as this "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy? Doesn't it kind of infringe upon that policy, even if it is indirectly so? I'm not trying to argue, but am really curious about it, do you know? [Raining here, smells so good, sleeping weather, a little chilly though.] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
At Dear Ol' AVL Airport, Asheville, NC | jls | Home Built | 39 | May 2nd 05 02:20 AM |
From "Dear Oracle" | Larry Smith | Home Built | 0 | December 27th 03 04:25 AM |
About death threats and other Usenet potpourri :-) | Dudley Henriques | Military Aviation | 4 | December 23rd 03 07:16 AM |
Dear Dr. Strangewater | pac plyer | Home Built | 8 | August 20th 03 12:45 PM |