![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() One point not reiterated yet here -- the atmosphere down low is very different from what you're used to at 2000 feet and above. It's easy to say "I haven't unintentionally stalled /spun in a thermal in a thousand hours. How much of a dope do you have to be?" A short list of what's different down low: The atmosphere is much more turbulent. Thermals, such as they are are much smaller. In this layer, many small punchy thermals will start. Many will die. The ones we use up higher consist of many little parcels of hot air that have coalesced. Most thermals are either short lived, or basically unworkable to a modern glider. You're in the boundary layer where wind is being affected by the ground, so there is wind-induced turbulence. Punches of strong lift/gust followed by sink when you make a half turn will be the norm. The ground picture will be totally different to the pilot. If you turn downwind at altitude, you don't notice that much. If you turn downwind at 300 feet, all of a sudden the ground will rush by and, this being a high stress moment, you may pull back. Just as the gust you turned in fades, or the thermal turns to sink. And when the canopy fills with trees going by at 70 mph, the urge to pull back will be really strong. You may push forward to recover at altitude, but it's really really hard to do with the ground coming up fast. So, just because you've never unintentionally spun at altitude does not mean your chances at 300 feet are the same. Not to raise a tired subject, but why we give out contest points for thermaling at 300 feet or below remains a puzzling question to me. John Cochrane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
It's Da' Spin,Boss! Da' Spin! | [email protected] | Home Built | 8 | November 19th 08 10:28 PM |
Stall/ Spin testing the RV-12 | cavelamb himself[_4_] | Home Built | 3 | May 14th 08 07:01 PM |
Glider Stall Spin Video on YouTube | ContestID67 | Soaring | 13 | July 5th 07 08:56 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |