A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Is there a place for Traditional CAS in the 21st century?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #17  
Old March 17th 04, 03:19 AM
Peter Stickney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Peter Kemp writes:
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:55:50 GMT, "John R Weiss"
wrote:

"Tony Williams" wrote...

Of course, but the opportunities for recognising different vehicles in
different conditions from an aircraft must be limited, and looking at
films isn't quite the same thing. My suggestion is that viewing
training videos from UAVs would look exactly like what the operator
would see on his screen for real. And he could do it again and again.


The training opportunities you describe would be available equally to pilots and
UAV operators. The pilots would still have the advantage of being able to see
or visualize the broader picture available from the cockpit.

Also, repeating the same "canned" scenarios ad nauseum may not provide any
additional training. Without experience, any difference from the already-seen
perspective may be unidentifiable.


But the pilot is unlikely to be able to fit his copy of Janes Armour
and Artillery in the cockpit, and the UAV jockey can have his next to
his terminal.


Which, with the way that the business of who is on who's side is
stacking up these days, won't help a damned bit anyway. For example,
in 1991, during the Second Gulf War, you had among the Coalition
members Syria and re rump Kuwaiti Liberation Force, equipped with
Soviet T-62 and T-72 tanks, BMPs adn BTRs, (Or, in the Kuwaiti case,
the Yugoslav clones of same (M-84?). Fat lot of good recognizing
shapes is going to do you. Paint jobs don't help either, Once an
armored vehicle's been out of the Kaserne for 20 minutes, the only way
to tell what colors it had been painted is to wipe off the dust.

And somebody ele's point of having "Higher Authority" around to settle
policy matters doesn't particularly stack up, either. Consider the
case of teh U.S Army UH-60 that was nailed by an F-15 in '91 or '92.
The pilots weren't 100% sure, one way or another, about their visual
ID of the aircraft. But they also had Higher Authority, in the form
of an AWACS Controller, screaming for them to shoot it.

--
Pete Stickney
A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many
bad measures. -- Daniel Webster
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Funky place to store your fuel? BllFs6 Home Built 5 August 23rd 04 01:27 AM
FS: Soft Comm ATC-4Y 4 place portable intercom, $75.00 Jaysen Underhill Aviation Marketplace 1 October 17th 03 02:04 AM
FS: Soft Comm ATC-4Y 4 place portable intercom, $75.00 Jaysen Underhill Aviation Marketplace 0 October 17th 03 01:25 AM
Grumman 2 place Wanted Jerry Aviation Marketplace 1 September 13th 03 11:59 PM
4 place portable intercom For Sale Snowbird Aviation Marketplace 0 August 26th 03 12:41 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.