![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Peter Kemp writes: On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 20:55:50 GMT, "John R Weiss" wrote: "Tony Williams" wrote... Of course, but the opportunities for recognising different vehicles in different conditions from an aircraft must be limited, and looking at films isn't quite the same thing. My suggestion is that viewing training videos from UAVs would look exactly like what the operator would see on his screen for real. And he could do it again and again. The training opportunities you describe would be available equally to pilots and UAV operators. The pilots would still have the advantage of being able to see or visualize the broader picture available from the cockpit. Also, repeating the same "canned" scenarios ad nauseum may not provide any additional training. Without experience, any difference from the already-seen perspective may be unidentifiable. But the pilot is unlikely to be able to fit his copy of Janes Armour and Artillery in the cockpit, and the UAV jockey can have his next to his terminal. Which, with the way that the business of who is on who's side is stacking up these days, won't help a damned bit anyway. For example, in 1991, during the Second Gulf War, you had among the Coalition members Syria and re rump Kuwaiti Liberation Force, equipped with Soviet T-62 and T-72 tanks, BMPs adn BTRs, (Or, in the Kuwaiti case, the Yugoslav clones of same (M-84?). Fat lot of good recognizing shapes is going to do you. Paint jobs don't help either, Once an armored vehicle's been out of the Kaserne for 20 minutes, the only way to tell what colors it had been painted is to wipe off the dust. And somebody ele's point of having "Higher Authority" around to settle policy matters doesn't particularly stack up, either. Consider the case of teh U.S Army UH-60 that was nailed by an F-15 in '91 or '92. The pilots weren't 100% sure, one way or another, about their visual ID of the aircraft. But they also had Higher Authority, in the form of an AWACS Controller, screaming for them to shoot it. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Funky place to store your fuel? | BllFs6 | Home Built | 5 | August 23rd 04 01:27 AM |
FS: Soft Comm ATC-4Y 4 place portable intercom, $75.00 | Jaysen Underhill | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | October 17th 03 02:04 AM |
FS: Soft Comm ATC-4Y 4 place portable intercom, $75.00 | Jaysen Underhill | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 17th 03 01:25 AM |
Grumman 2 place Wanted | Jerry | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | September 13th 03 11:59 PM |
4 place portable intercom For Sale | Snowbird | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 26th 03 12:41 AM |