A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Poly Over Gelcoat



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old November 17th 12, 05:57 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected][_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 97
Default Poly Over Gelcoat


There are Huge potential problems; Their extent and severity depend upon:

1) The condition of the gelcoat prior to poly topcoat. If it was crazed/cracked prior to topcoat and was not removed, the cracks will eventually propagate up through the poly.

2) The skill, knowledge base, and integrity of the operator who did the job. The task is highly operator-sensitive. Unskilled and/or ignorant and/or unscrupulous operator = a huge potential problem down the road.

Even some famous, purportedly reputable shops have "refinished" gliders by scuffing up the 100% crazed gelcoat, blowing on a ton of primer, followed by another metric ton of gelcoat or poly. AS-W20's, -19's and LS-4 an -3's have been the largest numbers I have personally observed. There was a cottage industry surrounding the refinish of these types 10+ years ago due to the crap gelcoat the Germans were using in that era.

These "refinished" gliders can appear fantastic for "a while" which could be a couple of years to more than 10, based on the 5-6 ships I have seen that were refinished in a suboptimal fashion. In my experience, there is no way to determine the quality of the process without invasive procedures; an excellent surface condition that is less than 5 or more years old in no way reflects the long-term durability of the finish. If it has lasted "a while" (see above), it is "probably" OK.

You either:

1) Trust the operator or someone who observed the entire process implicitly or .....

2) See photographs of the ship at each step of the process that are of sufficient quality to assess the surface condition. Note: these photos are difficult to shoot and the airframe is a lot of area. They need to be evaluated by an expert.

3) Offer a price of what a refinished ship is worth, less the some percentage of what it costs to refinish the ship in a reputable shop.

4) Roll the dice and buy it based whatever data you have. A modern reputable operator should have masses and mass balance measurements for each piece of the airframe pre- and post refinish. If there is a large weight gain or there are mass balance issues, or no data, pass. There should be photos of the process,a materials list, and a sign-off by an A/P or IA, whom I would want to speak with.





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ceconite v. Poly Fiber - Is one better than another?? DPB Restoration 4 May 17th 04 06:29 AM
Ceconite v. Poly Fiber - Is one better than the other?? DPB Home Built 6 March 17th 04 10:25 PM
Poly Dope Question Michael Home Built 3 January 29th 04 07:10 AM
Premium 3M (483) Poly Tape Soaring 1 November 27th 03 05:41 AM
Poly paint Miguel Lavalle Soaring 18 October 30th 03 08:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.