A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ground launches and weak links



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13  
Old December 4th 12, 02:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 106
Default Ground launches and weak links


I don't think most here have constructed a V-N diagram or know the basic actual limit loads as dictated by the BGCH of 1962. In the case of this document, Schweizer and Breigleb literally "Wrote the book".

Prior to JAR 22, the 24 fps gust was the prime driver for these gliders, and when using the mandatory design point Vg, typically gives a limit load of over +5gs. The the 2-22 also has a 69 Mph max winch speed. Are you saying that somehow, hundreds of similar gliders flying over 60 years have been doing so with a serious undetected flawed loads analysis?

If you are not an experienced degreed Aero Eng who has done V-N diagrams and perused the above certification requirements(I have) perhaps you should not worry about this as an issue.

Side remarks concerning the Blanik are unwarranted. LET did extensive testing and knew in the 60's they had a fatigue problem exactly where the Blanik wing failure occured. The eastern block design philosphy of "safe life" and abundance of cold war trained expert mechanics influenced how they handled this known problem. Have you seen the extraodinary detail and background on the loads analysis in the LET service/repair manual? Even so, post accident limitations indicate they were more concerned about aerobatic time than number of winch launches. Since the accident report has never been released, we will never know if poor execution of the wing rebuild on this aerobatic trainer just 800 hours prior was a factor. Based on the work I saw come out of the LET factory about that time I have my suspicions.

If this is not enough to allay concerns of winching the 2-33, consider that wing failures of high wing, strut braced aircraft are extremely rare. The strut and its adjoining attachments are sized for down bending driven compression and the resultant local buckling, and have a huge margin in an upbending case. Also, it is unlikely as I mentioned earlier, that winch tows loads are as severe on the Schweizers, the large moment arm between the hook location and the CG means you will run out of elevator a lot sooner than with a CG hook. Try ground launching a 1-26 and you will see what I mean.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Ground Launches" by Derek Piggott Randy Teel Soaring 1 August 9th 12 11:19 PM
"Ground Launches" by Derek Piggott Randy Teel Soaring 0 August 9th 12 10:10 PM
Use of weak links Paul[_7_] Soaring 64 June 8th 10 07:38 AM
Are Weak Links really Necessary for Aero Tow? [email protected] Soaring 41 September 19th 06 06:49 PM
Weak link for PW-5 Nyal Williams Soaring 4 June 1st 04 08:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.