![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robey Price" wrote in message ... After an exhausting session with Victoria's Secret Police, "Tarver Engineering" confessed the following: Evolution is false. OK...how about this... You are completely missing the point here, Robey. The scientific method everywhere except evolutionists is: That which is "experimentally demonstrable and repeatable" is a theory. But inside evolutionist land: "Falsability" is the major criterion of their own special "scientific method". Evolution as an origin of species fails even the evolutionist's own very low standard. "In the broadest sense, evolution is merely change, and so is all-pervasive; galaxies, languages, and political systems all evolve. Biological evolution ... is change in the properties of populations of organisms that transcend the lifetime of a single individual. The ontogeny of an individual is not considered evolution; individual organisms do not evolve. In fact, geological evidence proves in a hard physical way that if evolution occurs at all it must do so in a single generation. Or more logically, an already existing species replaces the previous dominant species in a locality. The changes in populations that are considered evolutionary are those that are inheritable via the genetic material from one generation to the next. Biological evolution may be slight or substantial; it embraces everything from slight changes in the proportion of different alleles within a population (such as those determining blood types) to the successive alterations that led from the earliest protoorganism to snails, bees, giraffes, and dandelions." Natural selection is a valid theory, but evolution as an origin of species is a leap of faith. - Douglas J. Futuyma in Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Associates 1986 What Jay Gould did is move Darwin's fairy tale a long way toward being Creation, in order to reconsile evolution with hard physical geological evidence that it is false. Darwin's evidence, Gregor Mendel's genetic research...fairy tales..OK, unspecified physical evidence you cannot site is proof...OK snip of peer review childishness Peer review is childish? If peer review is childish how were Einstein's relativity and Quantum physics verified? I guess cold fussion works in your world. Is Jay Gould peer reviewed? Then you can know for a fact that it takes a 1300 page band aid with very major changes in the process leading to a new species to prevent evolution as an origin of species from being demonstrably false. Come on JT...just cite some bible passage as your proof that evolution does not occur and be done with it. You have been blown out here Robey, but thanks for playing. Religion and the "free exercise thereof" is essential to a mentally balanced society. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Juan Jiminez is a liar and a fraud (was: Zoom fables on ANN | ChuckSlusarczyk | Home Built | 105 | October 8th 04 12:38 AM |
Bush's guard record | JDKAHN | Home Built | 13 | October 3rd 04 09:38 PM |
"W" is JFK's son and Bush revenge killed Kennedy in 1963 | Ross C. Bubba Nicholson | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 28th 04 11:30 AM |
bush rules! | Be Kind | Military Aviation | 53 | February 14th 04 04:26 PM |