![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Kevin Brooks wrote: snip No, the term "suitcase nuke" became a common (and misunderstood) term when Alexander Lebed came out with his since-discredited claims that the GRU/KGB had built numerous very small devices that could supposedly fit into a briefcase/suitase size satchel and of which some number were supposedly unaccounted for. One congressional committee even saw an extraordinary "mockup" of this fantastic "weapon". None of this has ever panned out as being based in real fact. Brooks Given the old Soviet propensity of duplicating, or attempting to duplicate, so many Western weapons systems, if only on the principle that if we had it they'd better have it too because even if they couldn't immediately see the utility of the system in question, no need to take chances (i.e., they couldn't afford to foster a "suitcase gap") -- how likely is it that they _wouldn't_ have developed such a device? David Windhorst |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Briefcase and Me | Bob McKellar | Military Aviation | 11 | December 24th 03 11:57 PM |