![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() If AQ had them for some time, they'd have used them by now. And would not have been wasting their time trying to foment "dirty bomb" plots. AFAIK, the smallest Soviet device would have been a 152mm warhead for artillery use--but that would undoubtedly have been a gun-type or linear implosion device, so it would be kind of long, not to mention heavy (more than 100 pounds IIRC based upon US 155mm warheads)--and of a rather small yield. Color me (very) dubious on this whole "suitcase nukes are lying around everywhere" hysteria that periodically arises (this ain't the first time). An ideal target would be a Presidential Political convention. Decapitation and the destruction of a substantial part of NYC would be a possible result of exploding a SADM at the republican convention. But you have to consider the democratic convention in Boston as a target since Bush is such an effective recruiter for AQ Brooks Let's hope Al-Qaeda is blowing smoke. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Briefcase and Me | Bob McKellar | Military Aviation | 11 | December 24th 03 11:57 PM |