|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#15
March 23rd 04, 04:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
"Jim Yanik" wrote in message .. . "Kevin Brooks" wrote in : The dimensions and weight of the 155mm rounds did not dramatically change (W-48 from 1963 at 6.5 inches by 33 inches and 118 pounds versus the W-82 cancelled in 1990, at 34 inches and 95 pounds) over the decades. 155mm is 6.10 inches,so how could a W-48 be -larger- in diameter(6.5")? and that includes the bomb casing. Gee, I am so sorry. 6.5 inches. Happy now? Brooks -- Jim Yanik jyanik-at-kua.net 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Briefcase and Me | Bob McKellar | Military Aviation | 11 | December 24th 03 11:57 PM |
Threaded Mode