![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 04:42 01 February 2013, Larry Suter wrote:
In his article on avoiding PIO in Grob 103's, http://www.soaringsafety.org/pilots/ic8.htm Dean Carswell writes, "the more the airbrakes are closed, the less pitch st= ability the Grob will have, making a PIO more likely if otherwise mishandle= d" Is there a simple explanation why opening the spoilers increases the pitch = stability? Does it somehow move the center of lift further aft? I believe i= ncreasing the separation between the cg and center of lift is the classic w= ay to increase pitch stability.=20 And if that's how it works, why does the center of lift move aft? I would g= uess spoilers destroy the lift downwind of their location, causing the cent= er of lift to move forward..... Thanks, Larry Hi Larry, There is indeed a simple explanation as to why opening airbrakes increases stability in pitch. It is to do with drag. As I assume you are aware, the reason that the airspeed increases when you 'push the nose down' is because a larger component of the lift force generated by the wings essentially points in the direction of the gliders horizontal motion. Obviously the opposite happens when you 'raise the nose', and again obviously the glider stops accelerating when the sum of the forces acting on the glider is zero (drag increases as the glider accelerates). Clearly the total drag at a given airspeed is greater when the airbrakes are open than when they are closed. If a glider is experiencing a particular 'amount' of drag at a given airspeed with the brakes open, then the same glider with the brakes closed will obviously have to fly at a greater speed in order to experience the same amount of drag. All of what I've just written is completely and utterly obvious, and I'm sorry if I've insulted your intelligence. However what I'm getting at is that, essentially, if you sit in a glider and move the stick forward by a certain amount, the glider with the airbrakes open is in some (rather handwavy) sense already 'closer' to being in equilibrium (or closer to the constant speed at which it will fly given the amount of forward stick) than the same glider with closed airbrakes. In other (probably rather clearer) words the glider with airbrakes open will not accelerate at the same rate, or for as long, as the glider with closed airbrakes, and will therefore have a lower speed (remember we are talking about moving the stick forward by a given amount). Basically what this results in is, again as you know, the glider feeling less responsive in pitch if the airbrakes are open - you have to push forward more with the brakes open in order to accelerate at the same rate as with the brakes closed, and if you want to fly at a given airspeed the nose will be lower with airbrakes open than if they were closed. This is why the glider is more stable in pitch, or if you like less responsive in pitch, when the airbrakes are open. I'm not entirely sure any of that made sense, but I hope it helps! Best, JK. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stability variation | WingFlaps | Piloting | 2 | April 28th 08 03:45 AM |
Towing stability studies | Dan G | Soaring | 27 | February 21st 08 08:38 PM |
Tow vehicle -- electronic stability control | Greg Arnold | Soaring | 4 | June 8th 06 12:31 PM |
Atmospheric stability and lapse rate | Andrew Sarangan | Piloting | 39 | February 11th 05 05:34 AM |
Prop Pitch Question | Eugene Wendland | Home Built | 2 | April 25th 04 03:22 AM |