![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 24/05/13 10:20, Larry Dighera wrote:
On Fri, 24 May 2013 08:37:29 +1200, george152 wrote: the 'solar powered aircraft' just another toy Hmmm... Are you referring to this one http://www.flyingmag.com/news/two-place-electric-cessna-172-skyhawk? Two-Place Electric Cessna 172 Skyhawk By Mark Phelps / Published: Nov 18, 2010 Flying Magazine | The World’s Most Widely Read Aviation Magazine Enlarge Photo You could say the bad news is that Bye Energy's plan for an electric Cessna 172 will have only two seats and an endurance of two hours. But the good news for flight schools might far outweigh those drawbacks. For one, the energy costs to fly the airplane are expected to be less than $10 per hour. Time between overhauls on the electric motor are expected to be as much as 25,000 hours, decimating maintenance bills. Power comes from a bank of lithium ion batteries, solar panels and innovative windmill technology that reclaims energy from the wingtip vortices. The electric motor (rated at the equivalent of 180 hp) weighs just 42 pounds, and there is obviously no fuel load to consider, but those weight savings are offset by the battery pack. The nose will be more tapered, and a six-blade composite prop will provide more efficient thrust (since its role as an engine-cooling fan is off the agenda). Weight and balance are said to be unchanged from that of a conventional Skyhawk. The combination of electric motor and new prop also promise much quieter operation in the training environment. Bye Energy President George Bye hopes to have a proof of concept aircraft flying (with a more conventional two-blade propeller) sometime next year. Perhaps, but this one is a toy I'd love to own: http://electraflyer.com/electraflyer-uls.php Introducing the ElectraFlyer-ULS! 21 hours flight time as of Feb1 2013 Technical Details Motor: 20HP direct drive Cruise Speed: 40MPH Flight Duration: 2 hours with full battery packs Battery Packs: Battery packs 1x4.0kwh standard, 2x4.0kwh option Weight: Empty weight Maximum Take-off Weight (MTOW) All carbon fiber construction 245 lbs 525 lbs Best L/D: 20:1 Min sink rate: 236 ft/min Price: $59K US ready to fly And then, there's this one: http://www.solarimpulse.com/en/. I wouldn't characterize it so much as a toy, given that it has successfully flown half way across the North American continent; more a proof of concept: Flight Phoenix KPHX - Dallas KDFW Pilot: André Borschberg, Co-Founder and CEO Take off time: May 22nd 04:47AM MST (UTC-7) Landing time: May 23rd 01:08AM CDT (UTC-5) Flight duration: 18h21min Average ground speed: 84 km/h ( 45,3 kt) Highest altitude reached: 27 000 ft Flight Distance: 1541 km (~832 NM) To mention any of these in the same breath as Moller is just a little misleading.... A cross country at 45 knots ????? That's a toy! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Travel aid | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel aid | [email protected] | Restoration | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel aid | [email protected] | General Aviation | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Travel aid | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | February 7th 06 12:25 PM |
Ground Stops and Ground Delay Programs | [email protected] | Piloting | 1 | February 18th 05 01:29 AM |