![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Wise" wrote in message ... In article et, "Dudley Henriques" wrote: ... I was well over 100 spams a day, due to having multiple email addresses, posting to the news groups a lot, and having a web site with hundreds of individual pages, each with my email on it. Changing the email addresses would have inconvenienced my contributors/customers/suppliers/relatives/friends. However, after some work and about $20 in expense, all but about 50 to 100 spams a day are flushed away and I never see them. Of the ones I still get, the funniest are the ones supposedly from the people who manage the email services for my domain. Since "I" am the only one who manages my domain, I tend to be a bit suspicious! After the Swen virus hit, I was getting over a hundred a day. I finally got Mailwasher and bounced them all. The robots pick up continious bounces apparently... Not really. The way most of these sorts of viruses operate these days is by turning the infected person's computer into a mail relay without their knowledge. The term for this sort of thing is "owning" a machine. They then scan the Outlook and Outlook Express data files as well as web cache and mine out all email addresses. The infected machine's new stealth mail relay mechanism is then used to send copies of the virus to every mined address...and it uses a return address of any one of the mined addresses. Any of the targeted addresses which actually result in another infection are in turn going to do the same process. This is why these viruses spread so rapidly. Why should virus writers want to turn peoples' home and business computers into stealth mail relays? Easy, they are paid to do so by professional spam gangs who will then turn around and use all these new mail relays to spew out their spam. Some 80% is relayed through "owned" MS Windows PC's on home cable and dsl networks (some 10,000 "owned machines)...and some 90% spamvertises Western sites hosted in China. It never ceases to amaze me how many people using Microsoft operating systems either don't care or are just to damn ignorant to secure their machines (with anti-virus software they keep current). That said, there's a lot ISP's and companies could be doing to stop or majorly contain such quick and penetrating viral outbreaks. Blocking this sort of stuff at the mail server or network border are not that difficult to implement....and should be required of every ISP and it should be free. I have such protection on all my clients' email servers, and it has caught and blocked 100% of attempted virus relays before they can make into my customers' mail boxes. It's only so many sysadmins at large ISP's are too lazy and/or incompetent, that consumers are left thinking Mailwasher and products like it are necessary. They are only necessary to make up for their provider's incompetence. So what happens when you're using a product like Mailwasher and it tags and rejects a virus-infected email? Not much, these sorts of emails have forged return addresses 99.9% of the time...and will either go to somebody who scratches their head wondering why they're being accused of sending a virus...or to a bogus address. The same goes for spam. The only way to tell the real source (well at least the last hop) of spam is by looking at the IP which relayed it to your smtp server (either by looking at your message headers or your mail server's logs). With that IP address, you have enough info to root out who is responsible for abuse from that net block and make complaints accordingly. The user-level anti-spam software is largely worthless in actually having an effect on stopping that spam from spamming you again or rejecting to the right people. It is reasonably effective of keeping the garbage out of your mail box...which I guess is as much as most end-users care about. The fact remains, if the provider did its job at the server level, you wouldn't need such programs. I know that's a big "if", but there are plenty of IPS's (as well as email hosters) to choose from who actually know a thing or two about blocking spam and viruses. Of course, you could always get a Mac and never have to worry about these sorts of viruses. ; ) --Mike First of all, my computer is protected by a very good anti virus program. In fact, the virus was never an issue for me. What WAS an issue were the 100 or so emails, (infected or not infected) that were sitting on the Earthlink server just waiting for me to hit the download button so I could sit here for two hours waiting for the crap to get downloaded so I could delete it. The problem for me, as it was for many others, was the unacceptable download time taken to get these bogus emails down to where they could be deleted without opening them. I think we all know that the answer to this is for the ISP to have adequate programs installed on their servers to eliminate these problems, but the simple truth is that most do not. My antivirus program (Computer Associates) is completely up to date and will catch any virus' infected messages after downloading, but who the hell wants to sit on their ass for two hours and wait while all the mess is coming in at 56kbs; I sure don't! :-) After complaining along with a million other people to the ISP's to install software that catches all this crap, I, along with a million other people out here installed Mailwasher so that we can see what the hell was sitting on the server and get rid of the crap BEFORE downloading it. Bottom line is that until the ISP's start nailing this stuff on their servers, the general public is left to programs like Mailwasher to help them delete these messes from the server, or else get a Mac! I don't want a Mac! Mailwasher works just fine for me. In fact, the spam level is practically non existent at this point and Mailwasher isn't really necessary at all.....until next time that is!! :-) Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/ CFI Retired For personal email, please replace the z's with e's. dhenriquesATzarthlinkDOTnzt |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rec.Aviation "Rogue's Gallery" Photo Updates | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 0 | February 6th 05 09:05 PM |
Apology | Curtis | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | October 20th 04 03:27 PM |
Apology | Curtis | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 20th 04 03:26 PM |
Apology | Curtis | Home Built | 0 | October 20th 04 03:25 PM |
September Rec.Aviation Rogue's Gallery Additions | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 0 | October 11th 04 01:39 AM |