![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Parsons wrote in message ...
Cost less maybe, but you get what you pay for. More capable, no way. Using the same engines, the bus struggles to get to 31,000 fully loaded at 350,00. The 767 goes right up to 37,000 carrying 400,000. Used to watch the USair bus struggle to make IAD from ORY while the 767 went to ORD and DFW with no sweat. Minor nit..."Carrying" 400k? Surely you must mean a max t.o. weight? Typical payloads I see on those stage lengths is about 60-65k for a 767-200. Any more than that at those stage lengths and it gets a bit tough if there is any weather at the destination. The -400 can be a real headache. So what happens if either a 'bus or Boeing loses DC power? How far will either likely fly then? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Boeing B-767 Tanker case "Virtual Kryptonite" | BJ | Military Aviation | 1 | December 20th 03 05:15 AM |
Boeing fires top officials over tanker lease scam. | Henry J. Cobb | Military Aviation | 2 | November 25th 03 06:15 AM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
Boeing Set For Huge Profits From Tanker Deal | ZZBunker | Military Aviation | 2 | July 4th 03 03:18 AM |