![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 21:21:27 -0800, "Tarver Engineering"
wrote: "Henry J Cobb" wrote in message ... Paul F Austin wrote: "Scott Ferrin" wrote And yet you still don't get that it's because of the fixed R&D etc. Flyaway cost is quoted at about $150 million. The fixed stuff has to be paid whether we buy ten or a thousand. ITYM "has already been paid". Cancelling F22 now runs all that money down the drain. None of these developments will apply to the F-35? They were supposed to, but I am pleased the F-35 is different. You are pleased that it's going to cost them even more because they haven't learned anything? And maybe you haven't looked very close but the only real difference in aerodynamics between the two is the intake and the back end of the vertical stabs. Everything else is very similar. The engine incorporates F-22 experience as does the radar and I'm sure any stealth goodies Lockheed developed for the F-22 will help. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|