![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks - now I see what you mean. My confusion was because XCSoar does a
pretty good job of predicting the wind drift (due to getting good information from my CAI302) and so the flight track (rather than ground track) is displayed while circling. This makes it pretty easy to get back to the lift if, due to inattention or poor decisions, you get out of it. Slightly off topic, but IIRC I can set up the software so that it accounts for wind drift while circling and not in straight flight. I say this because I use the track to stay in the best lift while wave flying. "jfitch" wrote in message ... On Sunday, August 11, 2013 10:19:40 AM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote: What are you trying to say. Seems to me that the airmass is carrying the thermal along and the glider with it. With that premise, circling in calm air or in a wind makes no difference. I've thermalled straight up and with a 20+ kt drift down wind. I never had to hold heading into a wind to maintain center in a thermal. Or do I misunderstand what you're saying? If that's the case, please elaborate. ... On Saturday, August 10, 2013 8:43:05 AM UTC-7, Dan Marotta wrote: Your glider is drifting with the wind, too... Unfortunately, the earth, and the GPS system that tracks with it, is not..... It makes a difference if you are trying to relate your thermaling track to a track projected to the ground. Some thermal assistants (like SYM) draw a track on the ground color coded by climb rate. If you are drifting with the wind, this track quickly drifts upwind relative to you and the airmass (which are drifting downwind). Therefore the next time around your circle, the track will not have much relevance. The only thing that matters (as you have said) is the glider relative to the airmass, which the GPS cannot accurately track and plot. That relationship has to be inertially derived, or simple inferred to be static. The GPS plot is relative to the earth, which can be thought of as moving underneath you at the speed of the wind. Such a plot is of little value when thermaling though they can be useful for ridge and wave, which are effectively anchored to the earth. There have been some attempts to guess the drift of the thermal from an assumed or calculated wind speed, but most thermals where I fly are not so well behaved. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thermal Forcasting -Thermal index | gldrgidr | Soaring | 6 | November 27th 10 10:26 PM |
Manchester England (EGCC) Spey Engine (I assume) | Andrew B | Aviation Photos | 0 | October 9th 07 09:39 PM |
Circular runways for airports? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 15 | December 27th 06 12:24 AM |
Thermal Data Files Thermal Mapping Project Australia | Mal | Soaring | 0 | December 2nd 05 11:14 PM |
Circular Runway | jsmith | Piloting | 55 | April 11th 04 10:22 AM |