A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Uncle Fuzzies take on Self Launchers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #28  
Old September 21st 13, 06:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
2G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,439
Default Uncle Fuzzies take on Self Launchers

On Monday, August 26, 2013 10:38:05 AM UTC-7, Andrew wrote:
I found this website with an interesting commentary on motor

gliders.



http://www.trb.8m.com/index.html





Real has some important insights about the issues of flying MGs, but has reached a couple of very wrong conclusions.

First:

"The more complicated the motor the more dangerous. SLS is more problem than a sustainers, which in turns is more than an electric."

An self-launcher just has a larger motor than a sustainer; the complexity is very comparable. SLS will be heavier, which increases wing loading, but the start sequence is pretty much the same. In fact, I was surprised at the issue of getting all of the petal blades deployed - this is definitely not an issue with an SLS. Electrics are the clear winners on simplicity, but they are also the clear losers on range, which, flying 1000 k tasks over Nevada, is a big issue for me.

"Flying a motor glider could force you to more land out then having a pure glider."

If this actually happens, you are doing something seriously wrong. In Real's case this is his mystifying decision to carry ONLY 4 l of fuel. Fuel translates directly to range. If he had carried a full fuel tank he probably would not have had any landouts. The 13 l tank capacity only adds another 15 lbs of weight - this will have a negligible affect on wing loading (less than 2%).

The circumstances that give pure gliders a SLIGHT edge over MGs so emphasized by Real happens very rarely in reality. It happened to me a couple of times in 16 years. One was in a contest that had a weak day. I ended up landing at an airport (to get a landing card signed) and self-retrieved. Another pure glider also landed at the same airport. After I launched, a bystander asked the other pilot if he also was going to do the same thing! Not a single MG made it around that day w/o restarting, but pure gliders did (albeit by doing numerous low saves). I concluded that MGs were at a definite disadvantage in contests and stopped flying them.

Personally, I will only own an SLS (we don't have a tow plane here!). Pure glider owners must look at the short list of commercial operators and a few of the larger clubs if they want to tour the country - I only have to find an airport (of which there are 1000s)!
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Missles, pt 6 - launchers.jpg (1/1) Mitchell Holman Aviation Photos 0 October 5th 07 12:04 PM
Kiev's port view, showing SS-12-N missile launchers forward of the superstructure Dave Kearton Aviation Photos 0 March 2nd 07 07:12 AM
one of uncle sams aircraft? Stubby General Aviation 0 September 10th 06 12:11 AM
Microjet self launchers Bill Daniels Soaring 0 January 18th 04 05:07 PM
Newbie questions Rail / Ejector launchers AL Military Aviation 19 November 14th 03 08:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.