![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Monday, August 26, 2013 10:38:05 AM UTC-7, Andrew wrote:
I found this website with an interesting commentary on motor gliders. http://www.trb.8m.com/index.html Real has some important insights about the issues of flying MGs, but has reached a couple of very wrong conclusions. First: "The more complicated the motor the more dangerous. SLS is more problem than a sustainers, which in turns is more than an electric." An self-launcher just has a larger motor than a sustainer; the complexity is very comparable. SLS will be heavier, which increases wing loading, but the start sequence is pretty much the same. In fact, I was surprised at the issue of getting all of the petal blades deployed - this is definitely not an issue with an SLS. Electrics are the clear winners on simplicity, but they are also the clear losers on range, which, flying 1000 k tasks over Nevada, is a big issue for me. "Flying a motor glider could force you to more land out then having a pure glider." If this actually happens, you are doing something seriously wrong. In Real's case this is his mystifying decision to carry ONLY 4 l of fuel. Fuel translates directly to range. If he had carried a full fuel tank he probably would not have had any landouts. The 13 l tank capacity only adds another 15 lbs of weight - this will have a negligible affect on wing loading (less than 2%). The circumstances that give pure gliders a SLIGHT edge over MGs so emphasized by Real happens very rarely in reality. It happened to me a couple of times in 16 years. One was in a contest that had a weak day. I ended up landing at an airport (to get a landing card signed) and self-retrieved. Another pure glider also landed at the same airport. After I launched, a bystander asked the other pilot if he also was going to do the same thing! Not a single MG made it around that day w/o restarting, but pure gliders did (albeit by doing numerous low saves). I concluded that MGs were at a definite disadvantage in contests and stopped flying them. Personally, I will only own an SLS (we don't have a tow plane here!). Pure glider owners must look at the short list of commercial operators and a few of the larger clubs if they want to tour the country - I only have to find an airport (of which there are 1000s)! |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Missles, pt 6 - launchers.jpg (1/1) | Mitchell Holman | Aviation Photos | 0 | October 5th 07 12:04 PM |
| Kiev's port view, showing SS-12-N missile launchers forward of the superstructure | Dave Kearton | Aviation Photos | 0 | March 2nd 07 07:12 AM |
| one of uncle sams aircraft? | Stubby | General Aviation | 0 | September 10th 06 12:11 AM |
| Microjet self launchers | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 0 | January 18th 04 05:07 PM |
| Newbie questions Rail / Ejector launchers | AL | Military Aviation | 19 | November 14th 03 08:47 PM |