![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kevin,
Ye doth protesteth too much... F-22 is not a 'dog.' But its clear that absent SIGNIFICANT upgrades to its avionics suite it will have nowhere near the AG capability of the F35. That's why the USAF is spending the money, and for their efforts, they should get a nice capability to go with the signature, speed and other attributes possesed by the airframe. Remember, that's a capital 'B' behind that $ sign. These are not trivial amounts. You remember that line -- a billion here, a billion there, before you know it we're talking real money... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ... "Kevin Brooks" wrote in message ... "John Cook" wrote in message ... snip You might be right, it may go into service, and if reports are to be beleived - despite the cost, despite the reliability problems, despite the obsolete architecture, the only credable justification is avoiding an embarrising procurement fiasco, 200 odd hanger queens..... astounding... Yes, it is amazing--you, Cobb, and Tarver are the only ones gifted enough to realize what a true dog it is, huh? All of those blue-suited folks being too darned dumb to figure it out, right? Oops--spoke too soon; looks like you can add Denyav to your rabidly anti-F/A-22 cohort! My, what a fine, reputable group you have there... :-) Brooks Again, thank goodness you are not in the decisionmaking chain. Brooks Cheers John Cook Any spelling mistakes/grammatic errors are there purely to annoy. All opinions are mine, not TAFE's however much they beg me for them. Email Address :- Spam trap - please remove (trousers) to email me Eurofighter Website :- http://www.eurofighter-typhoon.co.uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|