![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1/23/2014 7:18 AM, kirk.stant wrote (w. some snippage):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2S7T81LbvIs Nice pass! A question for all you aero majors out the when pulling up at high speed, should you lead with the flaps, or follow with them? In this vid, pilot pulls, then lowers flaps after speed has dropped. My understanding is that it is more efficient to lower flaps (from cruise to zero, then positive as you slow) during the pull, and my experience somewhat bears that out (higher alt gain with a good pull and simultaneous flaps). Neither lead nor follow? Here's an attempt at one of those potentially worthless - in the sense that for all practical purposes it can be neither effectively measured nor implemented in real time - responses that might just shed some theoretical light upon one's flying techniques... If we - for the purposes of a pullup - define "efficiency" as "least aerodynamic drag possible per time instant" (since both drag and gravity oppose the ship's ability to trade kinetic energy for height) then the answer to the question obviously (!) is the flaps should be placed in whatever position minimizes aerodynamic drag for that instant's speed...think polar. Complicating factors almost certainly include time and flap position, since for any given (ever-increasing) amount of flap deflection (below the separation angle of attack) the wing section can generate greater total lift, which for a fixed-weight condition will be proportional to "wing developable G." So, will a shorter time at high G (and drag) - meaning a shorter time to change pitch angle from (say) "descending through pitched up" - result in greater speed at the start of the ascent than a "theoretically most aerodynamically efficient (longer-in-time) configuration" through the same angular change? I don't know, but my suspicion is aerodynamic efficiency would trump. In any event, if we take "the rapid pitch-up" scenario to an extreme, various fighters can demonstrate that a rapid pitch-up is a great way to bleed energy and speed (think "the cobra maneuver"). As foe Joe Glider Pilot, this is a great example of one (ideally, many) test(s) being worth ten thousand considered opinions! Kids, don't do this test in the pattern... Bob - it's still winter... - W. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
My favorite | nice guy | Aviation Photos | 0 | October 20th 09 11:29 AM |
Favorite Airlines | Kloudy via AviationKB.com | Piloting | 0 | May 7th 08 06:20 PM |
Favorite picture of my favorite airplane. | russell[_2_] | Aviation Photos | 3 | August 4th 07 04:39 PM |
Your favorite altitude | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 87 | May 4th 07 09:53 PM |
Which one's my favorite cheese? | Michael Baldwin, Bruce | Products | 5 | January 20th 07 04:07 PM |