![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Chris Rollings wrote: At 07:23 19 February 2014, Surge wrote: On Tuesday, 18 February 2014 12:07:20 UTC+2, Chris Rollings wrote: That might work but I suspect it would be impossible, in the real World, to get a sufficiently high degree of reliability that we did not get more accidents from innocent gliders be jettisoned at low altitudes than we currently get from kiting accidents. Hi Chris This is not a personal attack - I appreciate your valuable input but ... With modern technology we can reliably detect pitch, roll, acceleration of a tug plane IMO. e.g. My Note 2 has a magnetometer, electronic gyros, accelerometers, barometer, and GPS. I downloaded an artificial horizon app for my Android phone and when it blends all the sensor data you get a very reliable pitch and roll output. It doesn't even experience gyro drift because it is able to compensate using the magnetometer to sense gravity. Another example are all the Ardupilot projects. If they are capable of flying DIY autonomous drones around for under $300 then I think the technology is available and good enough for us to use. Even so, I'd rather have a 1 in 1000 chance of accidentally being dumped than kill a tug pilot and myself through a momentary lapse of judgement/attention. I happen to fly at the club in South Africa which had the low altitude, tug upset on Sunday 16th Feb 2014, resulting in the death of the tug pilot in a Cessna 182A. I simply refuse to believe that we can fly to the moon and back but can't devise a reliable automatic tow release mechanism. How many more tug pilots around the world do we have to kill before we devise a mechanism which works? To detect a tug upset reliably I think one would only need: 1. To sense the tug elevator at the back stop + 2. The pitch of the tug (say 20 degrees down and increasing) + 3. The load on the rope (glider still attached). I can't imagine the above being present in any normal operational situation. Paul Paul, by the time your items 1, 2 & 3 are present it is probably too late, the tail-plane is almost certainly stalled and even if the glider were jettisoned at that instant, the tow-plane would probably still pitch down another 40 or 50 degrees before recovery (I say probably, could someone please test it with a camera plane alongside at safe altitude, done deliberately it should be possible to pull the release at exactly the right moment - might take three or four goes to get on exactly right). The thing that is constantly under-estimated by those that haven't experienced it is how quickly it all happens. LESS THAN 3 SECONDS FROM ALL NORMAL TO ALL OVER. People take at least that long to react to something unexpected unless it is something they have practiced frequently, certainly not the case in kiting incidents. This is correct, except that the duration can be sub one second. Your only possible reaction is to shut the throttle. I am sure you can use today's technology to detect the effect, but certainly not the cause. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
inReach website not updating track automatically | Eric Greenwell[_4_] | Soaring | 4 | September 23rd 13 09:59 PM |
Compare/Contrast: CG hook on aerotow vs. CG hook on winch | son_of_flubber | Soaring | 37 | June 4th 12 10:40 PM |
TOST E85 RELEASES | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | March 6th 05 04:21 PM |
Cumulus releases version 1.2.1 | Andr Somers | Soaring | 0 | March 2nd 05 09:58 PM |
NSA releases EC-121 Liberty tapes: no smoking gun | Mike Weeks | Military Aviation | 0 | July 9th 03 05:06 AM |