![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/13/14 8:11 AM, Kevin Christner wrote:
Hi all, The news on flight 370 got more interesting today. It appears the plane flew for several hours after dropping off radar. This begs a few questions. Why, in this day in the security age, is it possible to turn of the transponders in flight? The historical answer to that is pretty simple. ATC actually wants the pilot to be able to turn off a transponder if say it is transmitting garbage, the wrong squawk code etc. Similar transponders allow the pilot to disable ALT mode on the transponder if it is spewing wrong altitude data. In say the worst case a transponder stuck transmitting various 7xxx codes is not going to be real popular with ATC. FAR/AIM discuses the phraseology ATC will use to instruct a pilot to turn off ALT mode ("STOP ALTITUDE SQUAWK") or turn off the transponder ("SQAWK STANDBY"). Why don't all airplanes have GPS tracking systems giving real time data to ATC (perhaps we could loan them a SPOT)? I think parts of that question has been addressed in lots of places including the general media. This B777 had lots of tracking technology on board, including Mode S transponders, 1090ES Out, ACARS via both VHF Data and SITA/Inmarsat. I am not sure that it needs any more technology added to it. And anything you do add will be able to be disabled by somebody with the appropriate access (even if that meant doing things like visiting the avionics bay). My concern are less about any technology aboard the B777. That aircraft is was flying close to Malaysia when contact was lost. How can you possibly have a modern military air defense systems not be able to track a primary radar target the size of a B777 so close to your coastline, and that then apparently turns back and flies over your mainland. Malaysia sit between Indonesia and the South China Sea area. If it was me I'd be making sure my integrated air defense system actually worked (they have supposedly spent money on building that). They owns enough interesting modern air defense radar bits and pieces, multiple SELEX RAT31 systems for example. They should have had a pair of armed F/A-18D's out of RMAF Butterworth heading towards that B777 soon after things went very weird (especially if they thought they had a VHF/HF/Transponder silent B777 turning back towards the country). They have a squadron of upgraded F/A-18Ds with APG-79 radar sitting at Butterworth, should be able to pick up an airliner near the last reported location not long after take off from there. And the B777 seems to have practically turned back and overflew Butterworth... The Malaysian military and their air defense system pretty looks beyond pathetic based on all this, especially in a post 9/11 world. Darryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Troubling story and some questions | [email protected] | Soaring | 86 | January 15th 08 02:53 PM |
More questions on VFR flight following. | Tman | Piloting | 135 | January 8th 08 03:45 PM |
Flight Questions | Jed | Piloting | 32 | September 15th 07 03:12 PM |
flight level questions | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 14th 06 09:13 PM |
IFR flight in MSFS '98 questions | Sydney Hoeltzli | Simulators | 9 | July 31st 03 12:05 AM |