![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chad Irby wrote:
James Robinson wrote: Chad Irby wrote: But for transportation, they're insanely easier to target. Insanely? If they are so easy, why didn't the IRA, Basques, Red Army Brigade, or Bader Meinhof take more advantage of that weakness? Not as flashy. You don't think a train filled with people involved in a derailment wouldn't attract significant attention, given all the media focus when there is an accident? Especially given the national pride in their high speed rail systems. Note the *three* separate attempts at hitting high-speed rail in Europe in the last few weeks (the Spanish bomb, the French extortion attempt, and the German derailing try). All low-dollar, minimal effort, high-return operations. Again, my question. Why wouldn't other terror groups have taken advantage of that, if things are so easy to achieve an end result. The next attack might be in the lineup for tickets for Disney World, at a shopping center during Christmas shopping, on a ferry boat, and so on. Small areas, compared to even *one* short-distance train track. Have you been on the Staten Island ferry lately? Nope, but unless they've bought new supertanker-sized ferries, they're still pretty much limited to hitting them at two places on land, or trying a water-launched attack (not as easy as it looks). No, it doesn't have to be that exotic. They simply carry something aboard in the crowd, like they did on the Madrid trains. No place where the public gathers is immune from that type of attack, and we can't protect them all. On the other hand, a 100 mile train track has one hundred linear miles of potential target. There's no real way to get around that. Yes, they are exposed, but they don't seem to be the target of choice for sabotage. Occasionally, they are successful, but it hasn't been too often, and the results have usually been relatively minor. And while it takes some work to kill a plane or a ship, all it takes for high-speed rail is to drop something heavy and solid on the tracks at the right time, or break the tracks right before the train gets there. Witness the German attack, which was just some steel pieces bolted to the tracks (thank goodness the people who tried it underengineered their fittings). It's not as easy as it looks, given that it has been tried, and has only rarely been successful. Trains manage to hit things left on the track all the time without too much damage in the normal course of their operation. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
30 Jan 2004 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 31st 04 03:55 AM |
15 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 15th 03 10:01 PM |
27 Nov 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 1 | November 30th 03 05:57 PM |
18 Sep 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 19th 03 03:47 AM |