![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Henry J Cobb" wrote in message ... sid wrote: You are contradicting your fatuous "facts(?)" brooks. Now you are saying the the E-8 and E-10 will participate directly in putting ordnance on target. In a previous post you spouted this "fact(?)": "The fact that the USAF,USN, USA, etc., are not going to place those assets in a situation of undue risk is patently obvious." Naw, the F/A-22s will be the bomb droppers with Super Hornets providing targetting and air to air cover and Growlers doing the jamming. Henry, how on earth can you be a big fan of the Super Bug, with all of its shortcomings? You don't like the F/A-22, you don't like the F-35, you ridicule the USAF in general...yet you think the Super Bug is the creme de la creme? It'd take three tankers to keep the Bugs within radio range of the F/A-22... And the gent (mercifully plonked a while back) who took exception with the bit about the E-8 being involved has obviously not read the standoff distance that this *test* was conducted at--about 100 km for the E-8, which gives you plenty of leeway to keep the GMTI birds away from the teeth of the threat (and it was mentioned that the Global hawk could also perform this kind of support). Brooks -HJC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|