![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's what I would hope. I recall that, when I installed my Mode S
transponder and had it tested, it was putting out over 175 watts to the test equipment antenna. Don't we have an inverse cube function of power density to distance? I think that's right, though I probably didn't say it correctly. Anyway, an aircraft a couple of hundred feet away would be received in the milliwatt range, maybe somewhat more, but certainly not at 100+ watts. "Ramy" wrote in message ... I am pretty sure that the suppression is based on power as well, in addition to altitude. So only a strong signal at the same altitude will be suppressed. Which mean you will still get warning for same altitude until the other aircraft is very close, giving you enough warning. I assume this is the same way that Zaon works. But again this is just my guess. Will be nice if Flarm folks will comment on this. Ramy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PowerFLARM 3.0 and TIS | Andy[_1_] | Soaring | 6 | January 21st 14 09:35 AM |
PowerFLARM USB 3 cables and ConnectMe to PowerFLARM through V7 | Tim Taylor | Soaring | 20 | June 17th 13 05:56 PM |
PowerFLARM 2.71...WTF? | [email protected] | Soaring | 40 | May 2nd 13 03:32 AM |
PowerFLARM Brick and PowerFLARM Remote Display Manuals Available | Paul Remde | Soaring | 30 | May 25th 12 11:58 PM |
PowerFLARM | Greg Arnold[_2_] | Soaring | 6 | November 2nd 10 09:32 AM |