![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Pavlov made a dog drooling predictable so is your response suppose to impress me? Just because what I have always posted about the F-22 has turned out to have always been true does not change my tendancy to post it. Cancelled doesn't always equate to "bad". Nor does poorly managed mean the platform in question sucks. The pilots who acutally FLY the F-22 and have flown the F-22 like it better. Are they delusional? The USAF has fought tooth and nail to get it. Are they not qualified to determine what they need? Who is more qualified to decide what the air force needs; a general who has to run the wing and fight the fight, or a politician who doesn't even know the X-35 was suppose to be the F-24? THAT is a scarey thought. I heard the annoucment. Sounded like Barney from the Simpsons ". . .so what's it going to be called? 'Duh. . .the F-35?'" Oh yeah, and I still haven't seen any strakes. I'll conceed one one point with a qualifier. Our ongoing fued hasn't ever been WOULD the F-22 be cancelled but SHOULD it. The F-22 should have been cancelled in 1998. The question of will the F-22 be cancelled is still open. That being said, I still maintain (as does the USAF) that the F-22 is the best of the available choices. The F-22 as an aircraft that is. In for a penny, in for a pound ... I don't see the Pentagon buying that and McCain has reason to be proud of USN's airplane procurement right now. Proud that the USN has that dog of a "Super" Hornet? More like Cheney should be kicking himself in the ass for shutting down the Tomcat production line. The so-called "Super" Hornet now has to fill the role of whatver it is it does when it was only intended as an interim fighter. Seeing how in the end it will likely be used more for tanking and EW than air combat it should be obvious that it's lacking in that particular area. As a *program* meaning mainly the the way it's being managed, funded, scheduled etc. it looks to have all the finesse of a monkey trying to **** a football. Wasn't there a lune CF-18 pilot aound ram by that name? I don't know. It wouldn't surprise me. First time I heard the saying I about fell out of my chair but it *does* get the point across :-) I hope for the sake of the pilots who'll have to fight that we get it but who knows what will happen. Why? For what? China. They've already got Flankers with AA-12s. What is an F-15 going to do when it comes up against a Flanker with KS-172s? (Which China is trying to get from Russia.). It would be like shooting the proverbial fish in a barrel. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Goodbye USA! | transputer | Military Aviation | 2 | July 29th 03 03:42 PM |