![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Ferrin" wrote in message ... On Sun, 11 Apr 2004 17:27:14 -0700, "Tarver Engineering" wrote: "Scott Ferrin" wrote in message .. . The idea back in the day was that with the Tomcat 21 they would have made improvements to the maintanance aspects similar to the Super Hornet. It would have been essentially a "clean sheet" Tomcat much as the Super Hornet was a clean sheet Hornet. Dude, Tomcat's numbers suck, get over it. "It would have been essentially a "clean sheet" Tomcat much as the Super Hornet was a clean sheet Hornet." The Tomcat is not an electric FCS airplane. What you are suggesting is back to the future. Which part of that did ya miss? They wouldn't have been simply sticking new sensors on a D. It would have been essentially all new. New engines, new avionics, new and redesigned airframe, etc. It would have incorporated a lot of "lessons learned" from a maintainability standpoint. Would it have been exaclty as good as a Super Hornet re. maintianability? Who knows. It would have been a hell of a lot better than a D's though. Why? US missiles finally worked through a lot of hard work at RPL and later Phillips to get the propellent mixes right for the first Gulf War. Sensor and guidance technology has made an additional leap since then. Technology has changed the nature of war and if the best you can do is apply the F-22 to some war with China, you need to join us in the new millenia. The end of mannned flight is near. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Goodbye USA! | transputer | Military Aviation | 2 | July 29th 03 03:42 PM |