![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 18:20:42 -0600, Scott Ferrin
wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 17:00:05 -0600, Ed Rasimus wrote: On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 16:18:30 -0600, Scott Ferrin wrote: At that point in the competition (two designs chosen of seven paper designs) unless the USAF did a lot of inhouse simulation/studies/ etc. about the only thing they have to go on is the data the manufacturers submit with their proposals. Excuse me, but this must be some sort of a time warp that I didn't live through. It's probably that age thing kicking in ;-) We're talking about the decision process the LED to the building of the YF-22 and YF-23. You might understand my confusion then. I thought we were talking about the contract award choice for F-22. To have stated that the AF bought an unflyable design would require a linkage between paper proposal and final decision point at the end of the fly-off. If we're talking about funding of Dem/Val, certainly there was a decision made to narrow the field (must have been around '84) and combine capabilities into the two teams. The purpose of Dem/Val (by definition) is Demonstration/Validation of the proposed concepts. That meant building the whole proposal package ranging from airframe to man/machine interface to aerodynamic modeling to training (both operator and maintainer training were required in the proposal). By late '87, metal was being bent and configuration was well established. Simulations were very far along. By late '88 prototypes were rolled out and flew successfully. After a year of flying both -22 and -23, a selection was announced. Don't see how that equates with your statement that AF bought an unflyable paper design. It was at this point that Lockheed and Northrop were chosen to proceed to building prototypes. Lockheed teamed with GD and Boeing and at this point GD said "uh, we got some bad news about your design." During Dem/Val a lot of things get tried in simulation and wind-tunnels. Typically if you get inside the big black hangar you will find a display of failed tunnel models that were developed along the way. In short, I don't think you've announced any sort of "smoking gun." Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 03:13 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 1st 04 02:31 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | September 2nd 04 05:15 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |