A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Why no Cannons on Police Helicopters?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old April 21st 04, 03:09 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dweezil Dwarftosser wrote:

Jim Doyle wrote:

"Jim Yanik" wrote:


Hey,sometimes it's a good thing to shoot a criminal.


Now tell me you're joking; that's just a ridiculous statement. It's never a
good thing to shoot anyone.


Well, there is a definite historical culture clash between Brits
and Americans concerning personal ownership of firearms (and that
alone is hard to overcome) - but it actually goes much deeper than
the legal mechanics of private gun ownership.

I assure you he is not joking, nor is firearm defense an
innappropriate response to a home invasion. The only one
of your points upon which there will be wide agreement is
that it is never (or rather, rarely) a good thing to shoot
someone - just as it is rarely a good idea to bash in a
person's skull with a bat, or to carve their heart in half
with a kitchen knife.

However, when that person invades your home, clearly with
the intent to do you harm (as in a burglary; murderous
intent need not be present) - the only safe way to ensure
he does not do you physical harm, is with overwhelming
force... and the more efficient/effective your choice of
tools, the better.

It's not as if each citizen receives a thorough briefing on the law when
they purchase their pistol,


You'd be surprised; many states do. (Particularly where
"concealed carry" is available to non-convict and sane
citizens.)

nor have they been deputised to shoot perps by the local sheriff.


No one - including those living where effective means of self-
defense are denied to them - requires deputization in order to
defend themselves from harm.

Is it correct then that in a free society one person has the
right to take the life of another?


If that killing is the only way to defend yourself from harm,
yes - and the tool used to do the deed isn't germane to the
question: a brick can kill you just as dead as a bullet.


I fully concur...If -you're- the burglar who shows up uninvited
and unexpectadly at the foot of my bed at o dark thirty then
brace yourself for about four 9MM FMJ's to the chest.

I'll gladly discuss right and wrong later in daylight when I'm
fully dressed and have all my wits about me.

Thank you for listening.
--

-Gord.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
*White* Helicopters??!!! Stephen Harding Military Aviation 13 March 9th 04 07:03 PM
Taiwan to make parts for new Bell military helicopters Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 February 28th 04 12:12 AM
Coalition casualties for October Michael Petukhov Military Aviation 16 November 4th 03 11:14 PM
Police State Grantland Military Aviation 0 September 15th 03 12:53 PM
FA: The Helicopters Are Coming The Ink Company Aviation Marketplace 0 August 10th 03 05:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.