![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "B2431" wrote in message ... From: Kerryn Offord Dweezil Dwarftosser wrote: Jim Doyle wrote: "Jim Yanik" wrote: SNIP Well, there is a definite historical culture clash between Brits and Americans concerning personal ownership of firearms (and that alone is hard to overcome) - but it actually goes much deeper than the legal mechanics of private gun ownership. SNIP This should be qualified. The culture clash is only over hand guns and using firearms for self defence (as a first line over and above getting out of there). Why should one be forced into "getting out of" his residence? If you do that you have lost whatever edge you may have over the intruder. If the intruder intends harm he will follow you outside. Let's say you have 2 children each in his own room, do you retreat alone, take the time to grab one or both? In the time it takes to wake one child and convince him he has to leave his home the badguy is on top of you. OK, once you get outside then what? If the intruder follows you and is capable of harming you he will still do so. Fight back once you are outside? With what? At least you could get to the kitchen and grab a knife inside the home. What if the resident is unable to defend himself or herself for whatever reason? Let me ask you a question. Is the life of a criminal more important than yours? OK, you let the badguy in, what then? You now have NO defense. What if the badguy decides to rape you, your wife or child? What if he wants to beat a family member? Don't tell me the family member will get over it, I have seen life long physical and emotional injuries. Don't think that's bad enough? He's in a position to kill all of you to eliminate witnesses. Why allow the badguy to make the dicision to harm you? No, the life of a criminal of the type you describe is worthless. Genuinely. Yet there is a distinction between him and some random hard-up opportunist burglar with a family to feed. Granted, he's in the wrong - but not deserving of a death sentence. The sole problem I have is with the very blurred distinction between the two, and the trigger happy nature with which a large number of Americans (taking Usenet posters as my only regular contact with Americans) seem happy to deal with in these situations. Again, I think this boils down largely to a difference between our two countries. Although the UK has crime, just as any other country, I have never heard in all my years of such an incident as you describe above. Although sadly, there's always a possibility that this may happen, we do not live in fear of such horrors. If you do in America, then I completely understand your motives for owning a weapon for home defence. But do you really live in fear of this? Can I ask of the circumstances you found yourself in when you drew your weapon? You can't shoot to maim or wound because he can sue and probably win. You really can't wait until his intentions are clear. If you can get him to stop his attack without shooting do so, if not shoot. In Florida the magic number is 21 feet. If the badguy has started his attack and you shoot him dead he is likely to complete his actions up to 21 feet. You may have a house with 21 foot rooms, most of us don't. The decision to shoot has to be made in an instant. In case you are wondering it breaks my heart when accidents happen such as shooting one's own family member. Personally I want every citizen taught basic firearms safety even if they are opposed to owning guns. They can use fake guns. At the very least every child should be taught what to do if they find a firearm. The NRA's Eddie Eagle program does just that. That's interesting and refreshing to see, genuinely. I have taken the impression from the majority of post over the past couple of days that there is a general blasé attitude toward firearms and killing in the US. I have very limited knowledge of the NRA, but from what I can see they seem to promote firearm awareness and safety - which can't be bad in anyone's book. Are all firearms owners in the US members of the NRA? Jim Doyle Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
*White* Helicopters??!!! | Stephen Harding | Military Aviation | 13 | March 9th 04 07:03 PM |
Taiwan to make parts for new Bell military helicopters | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | February 28th 04 12:12 AM |
Coalition casualties for October | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 16 | November 4th 03 11:14 PM |
Police State | Grantland | Military Aviation | 0 | September 15th 03 12:53 PM |
FA: The Helicopters Are Coming | The Ink Company | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | August 10th 03 05:53 PM |