![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Guy Alcala wrote:
Ed Rasimus wrote: On Sat, 24 Apr 2004 16:39:14 GMT, "Gord Beaman" ) wrote: The NTSB sure doesn't put much credence in eyewitness accounts at all. They use them only to add a slight amount of weight to physical evidence when there's some ambiguity in it. Rightly so IMO. As we've been discussing, there are "witnesses" and there are "Witnesses". The eyewitness recollection of Joe Bagadonutz, the night shift fry-cook at the local McBurgerWendBell, on the condition of a crashing tactical fighter might not be very reliable. The eyewitness observation of a qualified aircrewmember in the type who was in position might be of considerable value. Put a student tactical aviator in charge of the debrief after his first 2-v-1 sortie and you won't get much of value. Put the lead IP at the whiteboard with his three colored markers, HUD tape and commentary and you'll get a pretty accurate picture. Add the input of any supporting IPs in the flight and you'll be almost perfect. Now add the mission controller (if used) and the ACMI recreation and you've got exactly what happened. Evaluating the qualification of the observer is a critical part of the process. Sure is, but experience only helps, it doesn't guarantee complete accuracy. I'm reminded of an account told to me by an IAF pilot, of an IAF helo accident which a very experienced Canadian military helo pilot (instructor etc.) witnessed from the ground in the Sinai (IIRR, it was during the Israeli pullout in 1982). He was the best eyewitness they had, although they later found someone who had filmed it. When questioned, among the things he stated was that the a/c had definitely made 4-5 revolutions before ground impact (spins; IIRC, there was a tail rotor failure of some kind). When they eventually got their hands on the film, the a/c had clearly made only 1 1/2 revs before impact. Guy Not a bit surprising Guy...the finest minds in the world are all prone to these kinds of 'filling in' from the observed hints intermixed with what the witness expects to happen and intermixed again with his prior memories etc. The human mind is a fearsomely convoluted unit indeed. (especially mine when I can't find my GD car in the full lot) ![]() -- -Gord. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Friendly fire" | Mike | Military Aviation | 0 | March 19th 04 02:36 PM |
B-52 crew blamed for friendly fire death | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 0 | March 16th 04 12:49 AM |
U.S. won't have to reveal other friendly fire events: Schmidt's lawyers hoped to use other incidents to help their case | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | December 18th 03 08:44 PM |
Fire officer tops in field — again | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 13th 03 08:37 PM |
Friendly fire pilot may testify against wingman | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | October 11th 03 09:32 PM |