![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Given no one actually saw the final moments of the ship's flight, all any of
us can do is draw our own conclusions. Cutting and inserting from others' comments... Not too many good options if PTT is really low taking off to the South; you pretty much have to either get back to the runway or accept a desert landing. From descriptions of the launch field, "...or accept a desert landing" is a key point below safe-turn-around altitude (whatever that might be for the location/conditions of the day). It's critical ANYwhere. History - and slight use of one's imagination - both suggest it's far, far better to hit the ground horizontally than vertically. Screw the airframe, it can be rebuilt and it's likely going to get broken regardless of the mode of ground contact at a lot of western-U.S. strips. One of the pilots made the comment Saturday evening that the release on a Zuni could "self release / back release" without pilot input.... it was not a Tost, and required the big ring. I've had two uncommanded-by-me back releases on aerotows, both due to LARGE bows in the rope induced by strongly shearing western thermals, which on both days resulted in significant airspeed variations of tug & glider (hence the bows). So far as I was concerned, both back releases showed the releases had operated as the designer intended, though neither bow put the glider at risk of rope entanglement because both times I was above the rope, "admiring the bow." The ships were an HP-14 and a Zuni (which has a functional copy of Schreder's dirt-simple release mechanism; between both ships I've 760+ tows; you can do the arithmetic). Under similar circumstances, I expect a Tost belly-hook should've similarly self-released. The HP incident was at Taos, and I've never been so terrified of a rope break in my life, as the first big bow appeared below turn-around height, above the tallest sagebrush I've ever seen (taller than I). The actual release occurred at 1500' agl (whew!). I mentally wrote the ship off until WELL above return to the airstrip height on that one... I never again towed from Taos, given the lack of options below turn-around height; for me the potential return wasn't worth the risk. The Zuni incident was at Buena Vista (CO), again sufficiently high agl to climb away and go soaring. If [uncommanded back release] is correct, the bumpy air down low could have caused yo-yo effect and an inadvertent release. See above...for the record, the mechanical engineer in me happens to like the Schreder release design for a number of reasons, though as with everything aeronautical, it does contain compromises... That would have probably put Bob in the sinking air around the big lift at the end of the runway about the time of release To me, the only options would have been straight ahead, either hopefully on what was left of the runway or into the bushes past the end... I'm a Big Fan of "accepting the bushes..." Whenever I take off I constantly calculate where I would have to go if the rope were to break... ....as should every glider pilot on every launch... ... and, as I was lower than usual that day, I was looking at that. A damaged or totaled glider is still better than taking a chance on a stall-spin. The concept in the preceding sentence can't POSSIBLY be overemphasized!!! My count to 200 ft. AGL) lasted until we had been in the boomer past the runway end for a few seconds. If Bob had been in exactly the same air, any release before the runway end, he would have been under 100'AGL. I enjoyed my conversations with Bob before we gridded, and thinking of him now gives me an eerie feeling. Such a nice guy, happy with gliding, and willing and eager to learn more about desert flying. But, in the end, what can be said other than it was just his time to go. Yes, gliding is dangerous. I've been into soaring since 1996 and he was the 7th I've known to be called to the other side. We try to learn from others' mistakes, but in this case, as there were no glider pilots who observed the event, little can be learned. Not intending to quibble, but unless he was so unlucky as to center punch or slide into something very hard with the fuselage after non-vertical impact with the earth, the "little [to] be learned" is some variation of "Fly it into the crash!" It's critical whenever flying anything with wings into ground contact. My heart goes out to his family and friends. As does mine... Bob W. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Parowan Fatal Crash | ContestID67[_2_] | Soaring | 30 | July 3rd 09 03:43 AM |
Rare fatal CH-801 crash | Jim Logajan | Home Built | 8 | June 22nd 09 03:24 AM |
Fatal crash in NW Washington | Rich S.[_1_] | Home Built | 1 | February 17th 08 02:38 AM |
Fatal Crash | Monty | General Aviation | 1 | December 12th 07 09:06 PM |
Fatal Crash in Fittstown, OK | GeorgeC | Piloting | 3 | March 7th 06 05:03 AM |