![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/07/2014 22:02, Jeff Crowell wrote:
Coupled landings are still possible but not common--the pilots hate them for a number of reasons, and in truth there is little motivation or incentive to do them except in extreme need--every pass you automate is one less practice pass for you, the driver, and someday, when you most need it, the system will go down at one end of the link or the other, leaving you with the options you've always had--land the damned thing by hand, or, if you can, bingo to the beach. Option b) is sometimes just not possible. It was interesting to go through a 1980s NATO publication on aircraft capabilities (outdated, long superseded) and note how badly carrier aviation suffered from the assumption of "must have enough fuel left to divert to a base ashore, nominally X(lots) miles away, after a few bolters or a foul deck" in payload and radius terms. That was very much a peacetime assumption based on a fixed rule (and, as an older and wiser analyst pointed out, one reason it looked unfavourable was that the carrier might be far closer to the problem than the nearest reliable land-based field, indeed might be the only place to fly from with any chance at all of getting the aircraft or at least the pilot back...) However, it did highlight the point that getting back onto the birdfarm is a challenge and can't be assumed to be simple and easy, even if in wartime the answer might be "dry your eyes, Princess, and keep trying until you get it right, crash on deck or flame out... and if you crash on deck and don't die, I'll kill you myself!" I heard an anecdote that, for USN pilots at the time, the most stressful part of strike missions over North Vietnam was landing back onto the carrier at or after dusk... don't know whether it's true but I'm prepared to consider it. Still a believer in carrier air, though, and HMS Queen Elizabeth gets officially named on Friday which is a welcome move. (And I even know her first CO, even if only on slight nodding acquaintance: Jerry Kyd was an ace student on HCSC, well regarded as CO of Ark Royal, and liked and respected when he ran BRNC Dartmouth) -- He thinks too much, such men are dangerous. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
F4U corsair mods to make it suitable for carrier landings. | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 9 | October 4th 07 03:04 PM |
CVW-17 status | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 6 | April 18th 06 04:43 PM |
Night landings vs. day landings | Gerald Sylvester | Piloting | 15 | February 12th 04 06:38 AM |