Toxic Depleted Uranium Rounds... for Brooks

In article , "Kevin Brooks"
wrote:

"Harry Andreas" wrote in message
...
In article , "Thomas J. Paladino
Jr." wrote:

snipped
(Knew most of this)

All shooting ranges in the US (and NATO) have stopped using heavy-metals
in
all of their training rounds (including small arms). DU was never used
as a
training round to begin with because it is too valuable. The M1 sabot
practice round uses a steel core and behaves exactly as the live round
would.

Interesting. As a re-loader, I'm curious how a steel core replicates the
sectional density and ballistic coefficient of DU and therefore the
ballistics
of the round? After all, DU is about 2.33 times the density of steel (I
used
values for Maraging steel, but 300 series is the same, and higher than
alloy steels), so to keep the same mass the round must be bigger,
but that would degrade it's areodynamics.
Can you elucidate? I don't understand.

It does not have to. When firing the training rounds from the M1A1, the
ballistic computer is set for the APDS training round, just as it is set
differently for the HEAT round vice the DU APDS-FS--the computer adjusts the
aim point accordingly.

Just so.

Maybe I didn't snip enough, but he said, "exactly as the live round would."
That's what I was questioning.

Frankly, I would expect a change in ballistic performance, culminating
in an adjustment of the sights.

--
Harry Andreas
Engineering raconteur