FES - Take 2

On Friday, February 14, 2014 10:25:35 AM UTC-5, Luke Szczepaniak wrote:
On 02/13/2014 8:04 PM, Steve Leonard wrote:
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 6:27:03 PM UTC-6, MNLou wrote:
Although I enjoyed the discussion in my previous thread on drag and handicaps, I was trying to create a discussion about the benefit of having a reliable propulsion system versus a pure glider. For this discussion, please assume that someone created an FES system that had no drag and no additional weight. Thus, an FES equipped ship and an non-FES equipped ship had identical polars. Also assume that the FES system was 100% reliable. Do you think the FES ship would have a competitive advantage over a pure glider because of the ability to stretch the "safe flight" envelope? Lou

As the others have said, "OF Course it does!". Especially since you made the assumption of 100% reliability and no drag penalty. It probably does even with some drag penalty, and the existing weight penalty. But, as Hank says, you really can't put a number on confidence, and we want all the participation we can get. So, get your FES and come play!

Steve

All of the above plus the big advantage that hasn't been mentioned yet;
the mass landout scenario. Guys without motors are stuck in a field and
get home late, pilots with motors get home have a nice dinner and are
well rested for flying the next day...

Luke
I agree with all you guys.
In 10 years we all will be considered as kamikazee(to our grandchildren).
Lets try to minimize it ,and let FEZ guys make a kit for FEZ.
We could start in less restrictive land first, in US (our gurus like Hank,know how to make it legally)
He and I would like to put battery in the wings(I just put my word in his mouth).
Rest is FES company to think about.
For slow thinkers: here in US we can have some smart guys(like UH) to try implement it in gliders in US has now,and later EASA will see our 1-3 record and will adopt.
Luca trust me.
keRW
FES in existing gliders