![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Hix" wrote in message ... In article . net, "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote: "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... The earlier flights were not done in a re-usable spacecraft. So what? So that is a large part of what makes it different from the single-shot suborbital flights of the past. Not to mention the thousands of man-hours and cast of thousands needed to turn around the shuttle. One step on the road to non-government, gold-plated, decades-long development projects type spaceflight. The problem is that merely reaching the altitude is only a part of the problem. The real issue is achieving orbital velocity and the Rutan aircraft doesnt achive much more than 15% of the velocity required to put something in orbit. Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Spaceship 1 hits 212,000 feet!!!!!! | BlakeleyTB | Home Built | 10 | May 20th 04 10:12 PM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing | zxcv | Military Aviation | 55 | April 4th 04 07:05 AM |
Use of 150 octane fuel in the Merlin (Xylidine additive etc etc) | Peter Stickney | Military Aviation | 45 | February 11th 04 04:46 AM |
Ta-152H at low altitudes | N-6 | Military Aviation | 16 | October 13th 03 03:52 AM |