![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"John Carrier" writes: Dutch roll is an unavoidable dynamic response, not a desirable maneuver. It's no more useful than the phugoid. And no more intentional. You've never seen Dutch roll til you've seen it at high Mach. Quite disconcerting @ 1.75 (at this speed, we're supposed to be going straight, eh?). On the subject of instability, what was the aerodynamic cause of the X-2's departure and crash? Adverse yaw + minimal directional stability? That, and a bit of Roll Coupling, as well. -- Pete Stickney A strong conviction that something must be done is the parent of many bad measures. -- Daniel Webster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | January 1st 05 07:29 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | November 9th 04 03:47 PM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 1st 04 08:27 AM |
rec.aviation.aerobatics FAQ | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | December 1st 03 06:27 AM |
Dutch military cutbacks | Ralph Savelsberg | Military Aviation | 5 | July 2nd 03 06:08 PM |