![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 12:39:47 AM UTC-6, jfitch wrote:
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 8:17:50 PM UTC-8, Bill T wrote: Most GPS units in gliders may be WAAS compliant, but with the previous language they were not approved to provide adsb out because they do not have the TSO Certification. BillT It appears in the new rules that it only has to meet the performance requirements. Furthermore the wording would suggest it is up to the installer to decide that it does until the FAA indicates otherwise? Which is reversed from TSO. Almost any GPS engine is WAAS compliant now. But I don't know what else is involved in meeting the 'performance requirement'. It seems like there is hope though, given that the spec was written while vacuum tubes were still in common use. I'm sure Darryl will jump in at any moment and set me straight. More on the subject this morning on the AVweb website: http://www.avweb.com/avwebflash/news...e223533-1.html I'm also eager to see what Darryl will make of this. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USA Proposed Rule Change on Start Time Reporting | Tim Taylor | Soaring | 18 | January 30th 15 03:08 AM |
Draft Rule Change could effect S-LSA, E-LSA, and Experimental Gliders | Tom (2NO) | Soaring | 8 | April 6th 14 04:36 AM |
US: TSA RE-INTERPRETATION | Judy Ruprecht | Soaring | 0 | October 22nd 04 05:17 PM |
FAA rule change for charity flights? | Ben Haas | Owning | 7 | January 19th 04 04:40 PM |
FAR 91.171 interpretation | James L. Freeman | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | September 21st 03 06:00 AM |