|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
February 11th 15, 08:35 PM
posted to rec.aviation.soaring
|
|||
|
|||
change in ADS-B rule interpretation!
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 8:17:50 PM UTC-8, Bill T wrote:
Most GPS units in gliders may be WAAS compliant, but with the previous language they were not approved to provide adsb out because they do not have the TSO Certification. BillT Many consumer GPS chipset based GPS receivers in gliders may utilize WAAS/SBAS technology. But that is *very* different than what is meant by a IFW/WAAS GPS receiver like specified for example in TSO-C145 and the RTCA standards it incorporates. I would be surprised if there is any GPS receivers installed in any glider gliders that is "WAAS Compliant" if that means TSO-C145, if not that then "compliant" to what standard? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| USA Proposed Rule Change on Start Time Reporting | Tim Taylor | Soaring | 18 | January 30th 15 03:08 AM |
| Draft Rule Change could effect S-LSA, E-LSA, and Experimental Gliders | Tom (2NO) | Soaring | 8 | April 6th 14 04:36 AM |
| US: TSA RE-INTERPRETATION | Judy Ruprecht | Soaring | 0 | October 22nd 04 05:17 PM |
| FAA rule change for charity flights? | Ben Haas | Owning | 7 | January 19th 04 04:40 PM |
| FAR 91.171 interpretation | James L. Freeman | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | September 21st 03 06:00 AM |
Threaded Mode