A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Not to sound like an F-22 cheerleader but I thought this was interesting. . .



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #15  
Old May 20th 04, 05:27 PM
SFerrin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 20 May 2004 14:37:07 GMT, (Denyav) wrote:

Nope it just puts civilian transmitters on the target list.


and turns your target list into a thick "target book" even if we assume that
planes could safely reach HARM firing range while they tracked continously by
their opponents.(not very likely).


1. The only way to use it with missiles would be some form of command
guidance. I needn't say what would happen to that transmitter.

2. With SDB you can hit *many* targets in one pass. With the wing
kit on them they have a range in the 30 to 50 mile range.

3. About the best way I can think of would be to use the imaginary
radar system to find the x,y,z coordinate of the aircraft, fire off a
FAST surface-to-air missile that has a good IIR seeker. Send periodic
updates to the missile until it's close enough to see the target.

The weak links I see are the transmitter that sends the update though
they could make it so 99.9% of the time it's off the air except for
when you're making sure the missile has the right target, but even
then we're talking seconds. Also your missiles are going to be
relatively large (you're not going to hit an aircraft cruising at
altitude with a MANPADS) and they're definitely going to cost more
than the SDB required to take them out. Overall, in a BEST case
scenario, trying to counter stealth with your system is going to be a
losing battle. However we're dealing with what's REAL here and that
being the case NOBODY has this kind of system nor is likely to have
one anytime soo. You may as well be using the starship Enterprise in
your arguements.



BTW you must also shut down or bomb your own transmitters too,military or
civilian, for the best results !.
Good Luck.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
what is good sound proofing for interior?!?! Rick Home Built 12 May 13th 04 02:29 AM
How Aircraft Stay In The Air Sarah Hotdesking Military Aviation 145 March 25th 04 05:13 PM
Pulse jet active sound attentuation Jay Home Built 32 March 19th 04 05:57 AM
The sound of survival: Huey's distinctive 'whop-whop' will be heard again locally, By Ian Thompson/McNaughton Newspapers Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 February 19th 04 12:01 AM
F-86 and sound barrier VH Military Aviation 43 September 26th 03 02:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.