A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

PowerFlarm Update?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old March 13th 15, 10:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
pcool
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 69
Default PowerFlarm Update?

There is no more competitor for Flarm. They have the monopoly of collision
avoidance systems.
The other company has ceased distributing products as far as I know.
They never obtained any kind of support, of course, from Flarm.

OGN (open glider network) glidernet.org is working on a OGN tracker, and
the base stations as a consequence are being obscurated by flarm through the
release of v6.0 that changes the protocol they could still read thanks to
Hiram Yaeger. Flarm is now entering the business of online tracking,
apparently, and the first thing to do is get back monopoly on the data
transmission, just to be sure.
There is no other reason to change the protocol and not keep it backward
compatible.
Beside, the new software must still run on 2004 - 2005 early units that have
a miserable cpu and ridicolous memory. This means that functionalities are
not really changing for safety.

This is an old movie for me. Already seen happening here.


"Tim Newport-Peace" wrote in message
...

At 18:30 12 March 2015, wrote:
On Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 2:23:34 PM UTC-4, QRP Nimbus C wrote:
On Tuesday, March 10, 2015 at 11:06:55 AM UTC-7, Mike the Strike wrote:
What do the Swiss regard as "early March"?
=20
Mike

=20
To me, this is the very definition of "Having you by the short hairs!"

U=
nlike the flight navigation computer domain where there are multiple
vendor=
s competing with one another to stimulate a robust development and

support
=
environment, I'm quite surprised that there is no other entity to have
take=
n up the torch for this worthy cause (especially here stateside) to
encoura=
ge the same. For the most part, some healthy competition keeps all the
pla=
yers engaged, honest and focused. Maybe it's time for some healthy
discuss=
ion about an alternative.

With a market as small as this one, dividing it and trying to create a
comp=
etition to get to the financial bottom makes very little sense to me.=20
UH

There was a competitor once. I believe they tried to force Flarm to release
the protocols. Their web site seems to be closed.





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PowerFlarm Update for the Seniors Contest in Florida Richard[_9_] Soaring 24 February 28th 15 12:32 AM
Portable PowerFlarm hardware update kd6veb Soaring 8 March 22nd 13 10:44 PM
PowerFLARM core external display software update kirk.stant Soaring 5 January 28th 13 08:56 PM
PowerFLARM Portable - Firmware Update Available - Mode C Traffic Now Supported Paul Remde Soaring 24 January 22nd 12 01:50 AM
PowerFLARM Display Update Paul Remde Soaring 2 November 11th 10 06:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.