![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/21/2015 6:22 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 17:23:09 -0600, BobW wrote: Snip By way of Devil's advocacy...when I look at America's Cup and Formula 1, I see two of the most expensive sports in the world; both have been that way for "quite some time now." Arguably, each has *always* been at the pinnacles of their respective sports' costs. You might even argue that both today are examples of "If you build it, they will come," sorts of sports in audience terms. How exactly might we make that work in soaring? FWIW, in both sports, there's far more participation in headcount terms in the lesser expensive spectra... With all due respect, the active participation in headcount terms is bugger all. 20 or so drivers in F1 and under 20 yachts with crews of around 10 in the AmCup aren't exactly large numbers of participants in global terms. The numbers who will take the trouble to go to the track to watch are also pretty insignificant compared to the headcount of those whose total participation consists of vegging out in front of the goggle box. This is the exact opposite of soaring, where almost the entirety of people involved in the sport are either active participants or those who have stopped flying due to infirmity or age. We have almost no passive spectators and I, for one, am happy with this situation because soaring, along with ocean sailing racing and mountaineering, is one of the least spectator-friendly sports in existence. Thanks for clarifying what I attempted poorly to suggest in my 2nd paragraph. In the U.S., the Sports Car Club of America (to name one of the national groups promoting "average Joe" racing for weekend warriors) might be considered analogous to SSA and its membership when comparing SCCA to Formula 1, where the aoaring equivalent of Formula 1 doesn't exist...and never will exist in any of my imaginary futures, except maybe in some perverted form in support of nationally-backed warfare. The point I sought to make is that in soaring - just as with automobile and sailboat racing - there's some sort of inverse correlation between the cost barriers to entry and participation levels. "Qu'elle surprise!" Bob W. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Convention - B29 FIFI ------ Stealth Mode Noted!!! | Stetson J.B. Mentzer | Aviation Photos | 0 | December 27th 10 12:07 AM |
Flarm and stealth | John Cochrane[_2_] | Soaring | 47 | November 3rd 10 06:19 AM |
Standard Nationals-Hobbs | BGMIFF | Soaring | 3 | July 21st 04 06:16 PM |
Standard Nationals Need Towplanes | C AnthMin | Soaring | 5 | July 14th 04 12:46 AM |
Standard Class Nationals | Sam Giltner | Soaring | 1 | August 21st 03 01:42 AM |