![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks everyone! It's an H36, and the 1997 TC calls it a glider everywhere but the title, which just says Utility (eg, not Powered Glider, Utility category, as in some more recent TCs)However, a Standard AWC only has a box for category of aircraft, and says in the instructions that can be normal, utility, etc OR Special Class of aircraft, eg glider. Most other H36s here are Utility in the N number dbase, a couple are Glider and a couple Experimental. I would think one would defly want and we would probly insist on glider training to fly our aircraft, but still uncertain whether, technically speaking, a glider rating would be strictly required if it does not actually say glider anywhere on its airworthiness certificate...?
Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 2:51:17 PM UTC-5, wrote: Hi all, My question is, My husband is in the process of getting a standard AWC for his imported, into the US, Dimona H36 TMG. He applied to have it certificated as a glider (powered), but our FAA inspectors want to put Utility on the AWC because that's what's on the type certificate. Does this mean that the pilot would not strictly require a PPG w/ self launch endorsement, but instead could do with an ordinary power pilot license PPL? We were assuming none of our friends could legally fly it with their PPLs, but if its certified utility like some of their own airplanes, why not? Thanks if anyone can point me to the right reg or had experience with this, Kristin On Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 2:51:17 PM UTC-5, wrote: Hi all, My question is, My husband is in the process of getting a standard AWC for his imported, into the US, Dimona H36 TMG. He applied to have it certificated as a glider (powered), but our FAA inspectors want to put Utility on the AWC because that's what's on the type certificate. Does this mean that the pilot would not strictly require a PPG w/ self launch endorsement, but instead could do with an ordinary power pilot license PPL? We were assuming none of our friends could legally fly it with their PPLs, but if its certified utility like some of their own airplanes, why not? Thanks if anyone can point me to the right reg or had experience with this, Kristin |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Glider License to Power | soarpilot | Soaring | 25 | October 8th 09 06:39 AM |
FAA Commercial Glider License Questions | borntoglide | Soaring | 8 | July 30th 08 03:48 PM |
Should the USA have a soaring license, not a glider license? | Mark James Boyd | Soaring | 0 | August 6th 04 07:16 PM |
IFR in motorglider, or any glider | Jim Culp | Soaring | 2 | June 30th 04 04:50 PM |
Commercial Pilot Glider license in EU | Arnie | Soaring | 3 | May 21st 04 12:44 PM |