![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 02 Jun 2004 12:43:09 -0500,
Alan Minyard wrote: On 31 May 2004 16:01:19 GMT, Alistair Gunn wrote: The reason the Argentines came in low was Sea Dart, and the reason they knew to come in at low to beat Sea Dart[1] was because they had two Type 42s of their own. However it's only prudent to assume that it if someone sells you military kit that the version they sell you isn't as good as the one they use themselves, so they might have been concerned that a pop-up attack would have left them fatally exposed to Sea Dart[2]? [1] Though I believe they was a successful engagement with Sea Dart against a target at 50 feet? [2] Though, IRIC, the Type 42s (and HMS Bristol) where never deployed into San Carlos Water. I have often wondered why the Brits did not use manpads. Were they unavailable? they had blowpipe as their manpad. it was not very useful against fast movers and IIRC press reports were not very flattering about its performance. www.naval-history.net/F64argaircraftlost.htm has a list of argentine aircraft losses. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Army ends 20-year helicopter program | Garrison Hilliard | Military Aviation | 12 | February 27th 04 07:48 PM |
Warszaw Pact War Plans ( The Effects of a Global Thermonuclear War ...) | Matt Wiser | Military Aviation | 0 | December 7th 03 08:20 PM |
French block airlift of British troops to Basra | Michael Petukhov | Military Aviation | 202 | October 24th 03 06:48 PM |
Ungrateful Americans Unworthy of the French | The Black Monk | Military Aviation | 62 | October 16th 03 08:05 AM |