A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

JWGC USA update



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #29  
Old December 15th 15, 03:19 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Sean Fidler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,005
Default JWGC USA update

I think you may be confused with my position. I have been stating simple statistical facts on US/SSA tasking and these facts are very comprehensive per my annual report on US tasking proportions.

The USA/SSA has, of late, held roughly 5% (less than 10 task total) assigned tasks annually. That percentage has been shrinking. In fact, assigned tasks are on a trajectory to be zero in 2-3 years in the USA/SSA. The recent Junior Worlds ran roughly 6 assigned tasks in 11 flying days!

The IGC task guidance is 50% timed area tasks and 50% assigned racing tasks for a given competition. On good days, assigned tasks! Area tasks are secondary, assigned are preferred! This ratio was on target per IGC guidance at the Junior Worlds, yes.

The USA/SSA, on the other hand runs almost 70% timed area tasks (average radius 19 miles!). Again, only 5% assigned racing tasks. This is NOTHING like the IGC in my view. The USA, instead, runs their own unique (TIMED) Modified Assigned Tasks (affectionately known by some as the HAT or "half assed task" ;-)) which ranges from the INFAMOUS zero (pure OLC task) to one turn (basically OLC) to the so called "long MAT. Rhe UsA/SSA runs as money or more one and zero turn MATs than assigned racing tasks! The long MAT is designed to eat up almost all of the minimum time but calling the right task length is very difficult to get right. They are often not long enough and require a good deal of decision making at the end of the assigned portion. The problem with the MAT vs the pure Assigned racing Task it is actually extremely complex. Pilot workload is significantly increased. It favors proficiency with flight computers and requires significant heads down time contemplating various TP combination scenarios. It's like a high stakes casino really. You must put all your "chips" on the best additional turnpoints to add before heading to the finish in order to eat up any remaining minimum time. The key moments of the task is usually not the assigned racing portion but is the small fraction of the total task that is left to pilots choice. You can become a hero or a zero in a heartbeat. MATs are very much about calculating timing and playing with the computer to calculate potential options with visable weather. Nothing like the IGC at all.

These unique USA/SSA tasks are all intended to reduce land outs but the unintended consequences are they destroy tactical racing and further isolate the USA from international competition.

I think some of the comments from our junior team reflect this concern.

Sean
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
JWGC Narromine US team blog JS Soaring 6 December 1st 15 05:42 AM
Looking for JWGC blogs [email protected] Soaring 3 August 2nd 13 05:20 PM
JWGC 2009 Finland chandglider Soaring 9 October 2nd 09 01:50 AM
JWGC 2007 and EGC 2007 [email protected] Soaring 2 July 27th 07 03:36 PM
Dec 19 update DHeitm8612 Naval Aviation 0 December 17th 04 12:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.